Literature DB >> 7172783

The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions.

L A Weithorn, S B Campbell.   

Abstract

This study was a test for developmental differences in competency to make informed treatment decisions. 96 subjects, 24 (12 males and 12 females) at each of 4 age levels (9, 14, 18, and 21), were administered a measure developed to assess competency according to 4 legal standards. The measure included 4 hypothetical treatment dilemmas and a structured interview protocol. Overall, 14-year-olds did not differ from adults. 9-year-olds appeared less competent than adults with respect to their ability to reason about and understand the treatment information provided in the dilemmas. However, they did not differ from older subjects in their expression of reasonable preferences regarding treatment. It is concluded that the findings do not support the denial of the right of self-determination to adolescents in health-care situations on the basis of a presumption of incapacity. Further, children as young as 9 appear able to participate meaningfully in personal health-care decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7172783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  80 in total

1.  Withholding life-sustaining treatment: are adolescents competent to make these decisions?

Authors:  C Doig; E Burgess
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-05-30       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Refusal of treatment by an adolescent: the deliverances of different consciences.

Authors:  S L Webb; M F Marshall; F Boettcher; M Perlmutter
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1998-03

Review 3.  Who decides? Decision making and fertility preservation in teens with cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Gwendolyn P Quinn; Devin Murphy; Caprice Knapp; Daniel K Stearsman; Kathy L Bradley-Klug; Kelly Sawczyn; Marla L Clayman
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 4.  Ethical considerations for research and treatment with runaway and homeless adolescents.

Authors:  Melissa A Meade; Natasha Slesnick
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  2002-07

Review 5.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

6.  Legal Barriers to Adolescent Participation in Research About HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Quianta L Moore; Mary E Paul; Amy L McGuire; Mary A Majumder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  The family rule: a framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children.

Authors:  D M Foreman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  What Can Parents Do? A Review of State Laws Regarding Decision Making for Adolescent Drug Abuse and Mental Health Treatment.

Authors:  MaryLouise E Kerwin; Kimberly C Kirby; Dominic Speziali; Morgan Duggan; Cynthia Mellitz; Brian Versek; Ashley McNamara
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2015

9.  Strategies for conducting adolescent health research in the clinical setting: the Mount Sinai Adolescent Health Center HPV experience.

Authors:  Debra K Braun-Courville; Nicolas F Schlecht; Robert D Burk; Howard D Strickler; Mary Rojas; Elizabeth Lorde-Rollins; Anne Nucci-Sack; Dominic Hollman; L Oriana Linares; Angela Diaz
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Navigating Decisional Discord: The Pediatrician's Role When Child and Parents Disagree.

Authors:  Bryan A Sisk; James DuBois; Eric Kodish; Joanne Wolfe; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.