Literature DB >> 16834493

Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.

Kouji Urushihara1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Three conditioned lever-press suppression experiments with rats investigated the interaction between overshadowing and outcome-alone exposure effects. Experiment 1 found in first-order conditioning that combined overshadowing and outcome-preexposure treatments attenuate the response deficit produced by either treatment alone. Experiments 2 and 3 investigated the interaction between overshadowing and outcome pre- and postexposure effects in sensory preconditioning, varying retention intervals to engage recency and primacy effects with respect to treatment order. Contrary to when a solitary cue is conditioned, responding to a cue conditioned in compound appeared positively correlated with the context's associative status. These findings suggested that some of the basic laws of learning applicable to cues conditioned alone do not similarly apply to a component of a compound cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834493      PMCID: PMC1994924          DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  20 in total

Review 1.  Time, rate, and conditioning.

Authors:  C R Gallistel; J Gibbon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Interaction between preexposure and overshadowing: further analysis of the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Hernán I Savastano; Francisco Arcediano; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2003-11

3.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

4.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

5.  Outcome pre- and postexposure effects: retention interval interacts with primacy and recency.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-10

Review 6.  Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: implications for Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  A Randich; V M LoLordo
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Effect of US habituation following conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-01

8.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

2.  CS-duration and partial-reinforcement effects counteract overshadowing in select situations.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Interactions between retroactive-interference and context-mediated treatments that impair pavlovian conditioned responding.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

6.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Extinction with multiple excitors.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Gonzalo Miguez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Two roles of the context in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-04

9.  Conditioned suppression is an inverted-U function of footshock intensity.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 10.  The error in total error reduction.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.