Literature DB >> 18047218

CS-duration and partial-reinforcement effects counteract overshadowing in select situations.

Kouji Urushihara1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Two experiments used rats in a conditioned lick suppression preparation to investigate how the conditioned stimulus (CS)-duration and partial-reinforcement effects (i.e., weakened responding due to conditioning with a CS of longer duration and presenting nonreinforced CSs intermingled with CS-unconditioned stimulus [US] pairings, respectively) interact with overshadowing. Experiment 1 found that when overshadowing treatment was combined with either extended CS duration or partial reinforcement, the response deficit was weaker than when either of these three treatments was administered alone. In Experiment 2, the generality of the findings in Experiment 1 was investigated by replicating it with various US-US intervals. This time counteraction was observed only when both the absolute duration of total CS exposure and the US-US interval were short. The results support neither the view that the ratio between the total CS exposure and total time in the context determines the CS-duration and the partial-reinforcement effects nor the view that these two effects arise from a loss of effectiveness of the excitatory CS-US association during CS-alone exposures in partial reinforcement or early periods of CS exposure with long CSs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18047218      PMCID: PMC2215313          DOI: 10.3758/bf03206426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  14 in total

1.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

2.  Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning.

Authors:  Mark E Bouton; Ceyhun Sunsay
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

3.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

4.  Some effects of Two Temporal Variables on Conditioned Suppression.

Authors:  L Stein; M Sidman; J V Brady
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

6.  Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

7.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

9.  Relative durations of conditioned stimulus and intertrial interval in conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D A Coleman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Taste aversion after ingestion of lithium chloride: an associative analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Loy; Geoffrey Hall
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-10
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of cue interactions.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Interactions between retroactive-interference and context-mediated treatments that impair pavlovian conditioned responding.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Potentiation and overshadowing in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07

5.  Conditioned suppression is an inverted-U function of footshock intensity.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Stimulus competition between a discrete cue and a training context: Cue competition does not result from the division of a limited resource.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

7.  Overexpectation and trial massing.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

8.  Overshadowing and CS duration: counteraction and a reexamination of the role of within-compound associations in cue competition.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.986

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.