Literature DB >> 12075980

Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning.

Jan De Houwer1, Tom Beckers.   

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that participants will retrospectively adjust their ratings about the relation between a target cue and an outcome on the basis of information about the causal status of a competing cue that was previously paired with the target cue. We demonstrate that such retrospective revaluation effects occur not only for target cues with which the competing cue was associated directly, but also for target cues that were associated indirectly with the competing cue. These second-order and third-order retrospective revaluation effects are compatible with certain implementations of the probabilistic contrast model and with a modified, extended comparator model, but cannot be explained on the basis of a revised Rescorla-Wagner model or a revised SOP model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12075980     DOI: 10.1080/02724990143000216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B        ISSN: 0272-4995


  14 in total

Review 1.  The S-R information stream: where's the filter?

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

Review 2.  Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers; Stefaan Vandorpe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Competence and performance in causal learning.

Authors:  Michael R Waldmann; Jessica M Walker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Simulations of a modified SOP model applied to retrospective revaluation of human causal learning.

Authors:  Michael R F Aitken; Anthony Dickinson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

Review 6.  Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning.

Authors:  Oskar Pineño; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  The propositional approach to associative learning as an alternative for association formation models.

Authors:  Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Degraded contingency revisited: posttraining extinction of a cover stimulus attenuates a target cue's behavioral control.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2007-10

9.  Elemental representation and configural mappings: combining elemental and configural theories of associative learning.

Authors:  I P L McLaren; C L Forrest; R P McLaren
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  The role of within-compound associations in learning about absent cues.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.