Literature DB >> 16834494

A comparator view of Pavlovian and differential inhibition.

Gonzalo P Urcelay1, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments using rats as subjects, the authors varied trial spacing to investigate the conditions under which Pavlovian and differential inhibition are observed. Experiment 1 compared Pavlovian and differential inhibition with spaced training trials. Spaced trials resulted in only the Pavlovian inhibitor passing both summation and retardation tests. Conversely, Experiment 2 compared these 2 types of inhibition with massed training trials. This training resulted in only the differential inhibitor passing both tests for conditioned inhibition. Finally, in Experiment 3 all subjects experienced Pavlovian inhibition training with massed trials. Although this training by itself did not result in behavior indicative of inhibition, subjects that also experienced posttraining extinction of the training context did pass both tests for inhibition. Overall, these results are anticipated by the extended comparator hypothesis (Denniston, Savastano, & Miller, 2001) but are problematic for most contemporary associative learning theories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834494      PMCID: PMC1831827          DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  20 in total

1.  Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Raymond Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

2.  INHIBITION OF AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  R A RESCORLA; V M LOLORDO
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-06

3.  The basic laws of conditioning differ for elemental cues and cues trained in compound.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-04

4.  The role of context in the inhibitory conditioning of honeybees.

Authors:  P A Couvillon; R Hsiung; A M Cooke; M E Bitterman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2005-01

5.  Counteraction between overshadowing and degraded contingency treatments: support for the extended comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

6.  Overshadowing and the outcome-alone exposure effect counteract each other.

Authors:  Kouji Urushihara; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-07

7.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

9.  Inhibition as a "slave" process: deactivation of conditioned inhibition through extinction of conditioned excitation.

Authors:  D T Lysle; H Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1985-01

10.  Association between the elements of a bivalent compound stimulus.

Authors:  C L Cunningham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

2.  Changes in inhibition during differential eyeblink conditioning with increased training.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; Kathleen M Schnitker; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Some determinants of second-order conditioning.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Performance factors in associative learning: assessment of the sometimes competing retrieval model.

Authors:  James E Witnauer; Brittany M Wojick; Cody W Polack; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Spontaneous recovery of excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07

6.  Constraints on Enhanced Extinction Resulting from Extinction Treatment in the Presence of an Added Excitor.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Urcelay; Olga Lipatova; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2009-11-01

7.  Protection from latent inhibition provided by a conditioned inhibitor.

Authors:  Bridget L McConnell; Daniel S Wheeler; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

Review 8.  Classical conditioning and pain: conditioned analgesia and hyperalgesia.

Authors:  Gonzalo Miguez; Mario A Laborda; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-11-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.