Literature DB >> 16815920

A limited universe of membrane protein families and folds.

Amit Oberai1, Yungok Ihm, Sanguk Kim, James U Bowie.   

Abstract

One of the goals of structural genomics is to obtain a structural representative of almost every fold in nature. A recent estimate suggests that 70%-80% of soluble protein domains identified in the first 1000 genome sequences should be covered by about 25,000 structures-a reasonably achievable goal. As no current estimates exist for the number of membrane protein families, however, it is not possible to know whether family coverage is a realistic goal for membrane proteins. Here we find that virtually all polytopic helical membrane protein families are present in the already known sequences so we can make an estimate of the total number of families. We find that only approximately 700 polytopic membrane protein families account for 80% of structured residues and approximately 1700 cover 90% of structured residues. While apparently a finite and reachable goal, we estimate that it will likely take more than three decades to obtain the structures needed for 90% residue coverage, if current trends continue.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16815920      PMCID: PMC2242558          DOI: 10.1110/ps.062109706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  62 in total

1.  Evolution of the protein repertoire.

Authors:  Cyrus Chothia; Julian Gough; Christine Vogel; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases.

Authors:  J C Wootton; S Federhen
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  Dali/FSSP classification of three-dimensional protein folds.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs.

Authors:  S F Altschul; T L Madden; A A Schäffer; J Zhang; Z Zhang; W Miller; D J Lipman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  CATH--a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures.

Authors:  C A Orengo; A D Michie; S Jones; D T Jones; M B Swindells; J M Thornton
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Global self-organization of all known protein sequences reveals inherent biological signatures.

Authors:  M Linial; N Linial; N Tishby; G Yona
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures.

Authors:  A G Murzin; S E Brenner; T Hubbard; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds.

Authors:  C A Orengo; D T Jones; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Analysis of membrane and surface protein sequences with the hydrophobic moment plot.

Authors:  D Eisenberg; E Schwarz; M Komaromy; R Wall
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Helix packing angle preferences.

Authors:  J U Bowie
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1997-11
View more
  36 in total

1.  VITAL NMR: using chemical shift derived secondary structure information for a limited set of amino acids to assess homology model accuracy.

Authors:  Michael C Brothers; Anna E Nesbitt; Michael J Hallock; Sanjeewa G Rupasinghe; Ming Tang; Jason Harris; Jerome Baudry; Mary A Schuler; Chad M Rienstra
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Revisiting the folding kinetics of bacteriorhodopsin.

Authors:  Jonathan P Schlebach; Zheng Cao; James U Bowie; Chiwook Park
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Structural biology: The gatekeepers revealed.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Modern proteomes contain putative imprints of ancient shifts in trace metal geochemistry.

Authors:  Christopher L Dupont; Song Yang; Brian Palenik; Philip E Bourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Biophysical dissection of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Stephen H White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Interaction and conformational dynamics of membrane-spanning protein helices.

Authors:  Dieter Langosch; Isaiah T Arkin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  MPEx: a tool for exploring membrane proteins.

Authors:  Craig Snider; Sajith Jayasinghe; Kalina Hristova; Stephen H White
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Structural imperatives impose diverse evolutionary constraints on helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Amit Oberai; Nathan H Joh; Frank K Pettit; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Membrane protein native state discrimination by implicit membrane models.

Authors:  Olga Yuzlenko; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  A survey of integral alpha-helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Libusha Kelly; Ursula Pieper; Narayanan Eswar; Franklin A Hays; Min Li; Zygy Roe-Zurz; Deanna L Kroetz; Kathleen M Giacomini; Robert M Stroud; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.