Literature DB >> 23224861

Membrane protein native state discrimination by implicit membrane models.

Olga Yuzlenko1, Themis Lazaridis.   

Abstract

Four implicit membrane models [IMM1, generalized Born (GB)-surface area-implicit membrane (GBSAIM), GB with a simple switching (GBSW), and heterogeneous dielectric GB (HDGB)] were tested for their ability to discriminate the native conformation of five membrane proteins from 450 decoys generated by the Rosetta-Membrane program. The energy ranking of the native state and Z-scores were used to assess the performance of the models. The effect of membrane thickness was examined and was found to be substantial. Quite satisfactory discrimination was achieved with the all-atom IMM1 and GBSW models at 25.4 Å thickness and with the HDGB model at 28.5 Å thickness. The energy components by themselves were not discriminative. Both van der Waals and electrostatic interactions contributed to native state discrimination, to a different extent in each model. Computational efficiency of the models decreased in the order: extended-atom IMM1 > all-atom IMM1 > GBSAIM > GBSW > HDGB. These results encourage the further development and use of implicit membrane models for membrane protein structure prediction.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224861      PMCID: PMC3584241          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  101 in total

Review 1.  Membrane protein folding and stability: physical principles.

Authors:  S H White; W C Wimley
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Lipid-assisted protein folding.

Authors:  M Bogdanov; W Dowhan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

4.  Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  K Palczewski; T Kumasaka; T Hori; C A Behnke; H Motoshima; B A Fox; I Le Trong; D C Teller; T Okada; R E Stenkamp; M Yamamoto; M Miyano
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models.

Authors:  L Mirny; E Shakhnovich
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001

Review 6.  Matching theory and experiment in protein folding.

Authors:  E Alm; D Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Protein structure prediction by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; J Pillardy; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Protein-protein recognition: an experimental and computational study of the R89K mutation in Raf and its effect on Ras binding.

Authors:  J Zeng; M Fridman; H Maruta; H R Treutlein; T Simonson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 9.  Polymer principles and protein folding.

Authors:  K A Dill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  A solvent model for simulations of peptides in bilayers. I. Membrane-promoting alpha-helix formation.

Authors:  R G Efremov; D E Nolde; G Vergoten; A S Arseniev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  15 in total

1.  Protein Structure Prediction and Design in a Biologically Realistic Implicit Membrane.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Patrick J Fleming; Karen G Fleming; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Discrimination of Native-like States of Membrane Proteins with Implicit Membrane-based Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Kitiyaporn Wittayanarakul; Takaharu Mori; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Structure refinement of membrane proteins via molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2018-05-06

4.  Multidimensional umbrella sampling and replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations for structure prediction of transmembrane helix dimers.

Authors:  Pai-Chi Li; Naoyuki Miyashita; Wonpil Im; Satoshi Ishido; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Heterogeneous dielectric generalized Born model with a van der Waals term provides improved association energetics of membrane-embedded transmembrane helices.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Maryam Sayadi; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 6.  Computational modeling of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Julia Koehler Leman; Martin B Ulmschneider; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-11-19

Review 7.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biological membranes and membrane proteins using enhanced conformational sampling algorithms.

Authors:  Takaharu Mori; Naoyuki Miyashita; Wonpil Im; Michael Feig; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-01-05

8.  Diverse Scientific Benchmarks for Implicit Membrane Energy Functions.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Rituparna Samanta; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 6.578

9.  Efficient Flexible Fitting Refinement with Automatic Error Fixing for De Novo Structure Modeling from Cryo-EM Density Maps.

Authors:  Takaharu Mori; Genki Terashi; Daisuke Matsuoka; Daisuke Kihara; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 6.162

10.  Molecular recognition of CCR5 by an HIV-1 gp120 V3 loop.

Authors:  Phanourios Tamamis; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.