Literature DB >> 19815527

Structural imperatives impose diverse evolutionary constraints on helical membrane proteins.

Amit Oberai1, Nathan H Joh, Frank K Pettit, James U Bowie.   

Abstract

The amino acid sequences of transmembrane regions of helical membrane proteins are highly constrained, diverging at slower rates than their extramembrane regions and than water-soluble proteins. Moreover, helical membrane proteins seem to fall into fewer families than water-soluble proteins. The reason for the differential restrictions on sequence remains unexplained. Here, we show that the evolution of transmembrane regions is slowed by a previously unrecognized structural constraint: Transmembrane regions bury more residues than extramembrane regions and soluble proteins. This fundamental feature of membrane protein structure is an important contributor to the differences in evolutionary rate and to an increased susceptibility of the transmembrane regions to disease-causing single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815527      PMCID: PMC2764890          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0906390106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Selective constraints, amino acid composition, and the rate of protein evolution.

Authors:  N J Tourasse; W H Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Side chains in transmembrane helices are shorter at helix-helix interfaces.

Authors:  S Jiang; I A Vakser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

3.  Crystal structure of the calcium pump of sarcoplasmic reticulum at 2.6 A resolution.

Authors:  C Toyoshima; M Nakasako; H Nomura; H Ogawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  How membranes shape protein structure.

Authors:  S H White; A S Ladokhin; S Jayasinghe; K Hristova
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-06-29       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Natural variation in human membrane transporter genes reveals evolutionary and functional constraints.

Authors:  Maya K Leabman; Conrad C Huang; Joseph DeYoung; Elaine J Carlson; Travis R Taylor; Melanie de la Cruz; Susan J Johns; Doug Stryke; Michiko Kawamoto; Thomas J Urban; Deanna L Kroetz; Thomas E Ferrin; Andrew G Clark; Neil Risch; Ira Herskowitz; Kathleen M Giacomini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Scoring residue conservation.

Authors:  William S J Valdar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-08-01

7.  Transmembrane protein domains rarely use covalent domain recombination as an evolutionary mechanism.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Mark Gerstein; Donald M Engelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  hERG gating microdomains defined by S6 mutagenesis and molecular modeling.

Authors:  Sarah L Wynia-Smith; Anne Lynn Gillian-Daniel; Kenneth A Satyshur; Gail A Robertson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Excess polymorphisms in genes for membrane proteins in Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Sarah K Volkman; Daniel L Hartl; Dyann F Wirth; Kaare M Nielsen; Mehee Choi; Serge Batalov; Yingyao Zhou; David Plouffe; Karine G Le Roch; Ruben Abagyan; Elizabeth A Winzeler
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Distribution analysis of nonsynonymous polymorphisms within the G-protein-coupled receptor gene family.

Authors:  Andria Lee; B K Rana; H H Schiffer; N J Schork; M R Brann; P A Insel; D M Weiner
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  34 in total

1.  Structural biology: The gatekeepers revealed.

Authors:  Monya Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Protein folding in membranes.

Authors:  Sebastian Fiedler; Jana Broecker; Sandro Keller
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Marginally hydrophobic transmembrane α-helices shaping membrane protein folding.

Authors:  Minttu T De Marothy; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 4.  Design of self-assembling transmembrane helical bundles to elucidate principles required for membrane protein folding and ion transport.

Authors:  Nathan H Joh; Gevorg Grigoryan; Yibing Wu; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Packing of apolar side chains enables accurate design of highly stable membrane proteins.

Authors:  Marco Mravic; Jessica L Thomaston; Maxwell Tucker; Paige E Solomon; Lijun Liu; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Structural differences between thermophilic and mesophilic membrane proteins.

Authors:  Alejandro D Meruelo; Seong Kyu Han; Sanguk Kim; James U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Reversible Unfolding of Rhomboid Intramembrane Proteases.

Authors:  Rashmi Panigrahi; Elena Arutyunova; Pankaj Panwar; Katharina Gimpl; Sandro Keller; M Joanne Lemieux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Accurate computational design of multipass transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Peilong Lu; Duyoung Min; Frank DiMaio; Kathy Y Wei; Michael D Vahey; Scott E Boyken; Zibo Chen; Jorge A Fallas; George Ueda; William Sheffler; Vikram Khipple Mulligan; Wenqing Xu; James U Bowie; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The membrane- and soluble-protein helix-helix interactome: similar geometry via different interactions.

Authors:  Shao-Qing Zhang; Daniel W Kulp; Chaim A Schramm; Marco Mravic; Ilan Samish; William F DeGrado
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Membrane environment imposes unique selection pressures on transmembrane domains of G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Stephanie J Spielman; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.