Literature DB >> 22183804

VITAL NMR: using chemical shift derived secondary structure information for a limited set of amino acids to assess homology model accuracy.

Michael C Brothers1, Anna E Nesbitt, Michael J Hallock, Sanjeewa G Rupasinghe, Ming Tang, Jason Harris, Jerome Baudry, Mary A Schuler, Chad M Rienstra.   

Abstract

Homology modeling is a powerful tool for predicting protein structures, whose success depends on obtaining a reasonable alignment between a given structural template and the protein sequence being analyzed. In order to leverage greater predictive power for proteins with few structural templates, we have developed a method to rank homology models based upon their compliance to secondary structure derived from experimental solid-state NMR (SSNMR) data. Such data is obtainable in a rapid manner by simple SSNMR experiments (e.g., (13)C-(13)C 2D correlation spectra). To test our homology model scoring procedure for various amino acid labeling schemes, we generated a library of 7,474 homology models for 22 protein targets culled from the TALOS+/SPARTA+ training set of protein structures. Using subsets of amino acids that are plausibly assigned by SSNMR, we discovered that pairs of the residues Val, Ile, Thr, Ala and Leu (VITAL) emulate an ideal dataset where all residues are site specifically assigned. Scoring the models with a predicted VITAL site-specific dataset and calculating secondary structure with the Chemical Shift Index resulted in a Pearson correlation coefficient (-0.75) commensurate to the control (-0.77), where secondary structure was scored site specifically for all amino acids (ALL 20) using STRIDE. This method promises to accelerate structure procurement by SSNMR for proteins with unknown folds through guiding the selection of remotely homologous protein templates and assessing model quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22183804     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-011-9576-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  75 in total

1.  Domain orientation and dynamics in multidomain proteins from residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  M W Fischer; J A Losonczi; J L Weaver; J H Prestegard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments.

Authors:  B Rost
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1999-02

Review 3.  High-throughput, genome-scale protein production method based on the wheat germ cell-free expression system.

Authors:  Yaeta Endo; Tatsuya Sawasaki
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 14.227

4.  Rapid analysis of protein backbone resonance assignments using cryogenic probes, a distributed Linux-based computing architecture, and an integrated set of spectral analysis tools.

Authors:  Daniel Monleón; Kimberly Colson; Hunter N B Moseley; Clemens Anklin; Robert Oswald; Thomas Szyperski; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2002

Review 5.  Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.

Authors:  Talia Yarnitzky; Anat Levit; Masha Y Niv
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2010-05

6.  Triple-resonance multidimensional NMR study of calmodulin complexed with the binding domain of skeletal muscle myosin light-chain kinase: indication of a conformational change in the central helix.

Authors:  M Ikura; L E Kay; M Krinks; A Bax
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1991-06-04       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  A limited universe of membrane protein families and folds.

Authors:  Amit Oberai; Yungok Ihm; Sanguk Kim; James U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted?

Authors:  David Eramian; Narayanan Eswar; Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Intrinsic phi, psi propensities of amino acids, derived from the coil regions of known structures.

Authors:  M B Swindells; M W MacArthur; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1995-07

10.  Solid-state NMR and SAXS studies provide a structural basis for the activation of alphaB-crystallin oligomers.

Authors:  Stefan Jehle; Ponni Rajagopal; Benjamin Bardiaux; Stefan Markovic; Ronald Kühne; Joseph R Stout; Victoria A Higman; Rachel E Klevit; Barth-Jan van Rossum; Hartmut Oschkinat
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rapid prediction of multi-dimensional NMR data sets.

Authors:  Sabine Gradmann; Christian Ader; Ines Heinrich; Deepak Nand; Marc Dittmann; Abhishek Cukkemane; Marc van Dijk; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Martin Engelhard; Marc Baldus
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.835

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.