Literature DB >> 16811988

Pigeons' preferences for stimulus information: effects of amount of information.

L Green, H Rachlin.   

Abstract

A concurrent-chain procedure was used to study pigeons' preferences as a function of amount of information. Pigeons chose between two terminal links. Both terminal links ended in food reinforcement with probability (p) and in blackout with probability (1-p). One terminal link (noninformative link) was signalled by a stimulus uncorrelated with either food or blackout. The other terminal link (informative link) was signalled by stimuli correlated with these outcomes. Amount of information conveyed by these stimuli was varied across conditions by changing the probability of reinforcement (p) and blackout (1-p). The pigeons strongly preferred the informative link, and preferences were greater at p values above 0.50 than for their complements. The pigeons engaged in different behaviors during the stimulus periods, suggesting that the value of informative stimuli may be in their function as discriminative stimuli for interim activities and terminal responses.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16811988      PMCID: PMC1333589          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES.

Authors:  M RILLING; C MCDIARMID
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

5.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E Mulvaney; J A Dinsmoor; A R Jwaideh; L H Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Value of knowing when reinforcement is due.

Authors:  G Bower; J McLean; J Meacham
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-10
  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Choosing schedules of signaled appetitive events over schedules of unsignaled ones.

Authors:  P Badia; K Ryan; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.

Authors:  E Fantino; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice of timeout during response-independent food schedules.

Authors:  T Lydersen; D Perkins; S Thome; E Lowman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction.

Authors:  E Fantino; D A Case
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; D E Mulvaney; A R Jwaideh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Monkeys are curious about counterfactual outcomes.

Authors:  Maya Zhe Wang; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.