Literature DB >> 16811715

Observing responses in pigeons: effects of schedule component duration and schedule value.

M N Branch.   

Abstract

Pigeons were exposed to a procedure under which five pecks on one response key (the observing key) changed the schedule on a second key (the food key) from a mixed schedule to a multiple schedule for 25 sec. In Experiment I, a random-ratio 50 schedule alternated with extinction. The duration of the random-ratio 50 schedule component was varied between 1.25 and 320 sec, and extinction was scheduled for a varying time, ranging from the duration of the random-ratio 50 to four times that value. Each set of values was scheduled for a block of sessions. Before observing-key pecks were allowed at each set of parameter values, the pigeons were exposed to a condition where the mixed and multiple schedule alternated every 10 min, and observing-key pecks were not permitted. Rates of pecking on the observing key were high for all values of random-ratio component durations except 1.25 sec. Experiment II was conducted with the random-ratio component duration equal to 40 sec, and the random-ratio schedule was varied from random-ratio 50 to 100, 200, and 400. Observing-key pecking rates were high for all values of the random-ratio schedule except random-ratio 400. In both experiments, observing response rates were relatively little affected, suggesting that neither schedule component duration nor schedule value is a strong determinant of observing responses.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811715      PMCID: PMC1334167          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  BEHAVIOR STABILITY AND RESPONSE RATE AS FUNCTIONS OF REINFORCEMENT PROBABILITY ON "RANDOM RATIO" SCHEDULES.

Authors:  N A SIDLEY; W N SCHOENFELD
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Observing responses in pigeons.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W C RIDDLE; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus-producing responses in chimpanzees.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Observing responses and uncertainty reduction.

Authors:  J Steiner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 2.143

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  The generality of selective observing.

Authors:  Scott T Gaynor; Richard L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Observing behavior: effects of rate and magnitude of primary reinforcement.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Combinations of response-dependent and response-independent schedule-correlated stimulus presentation in an observing procedure.

Authors:  Anthony DeFulio; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure.

Authors:  K L Mueller; J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Nicotine enhances operant responding for qualitatively distinct reinforcers under maintenance and extinction conditions.

Authors:  Scott T Barret; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.533

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.