Literature DB >> 25862317

A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Carlos F Aparicio1, Mirari Elcoro, Benigno Alonso-Alvarez.   

Abstract

Contemporary analyses of choice were implemented to analyze the acquisition and maintenance of response allocation in Lewis (LEW) and Fischer 344 (F344) rats. A concurrent-chains procedure varied the delay to the larger reinforcer (0.1, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 s). Delays were presented within sessions in ascending, descending, and random orders. Each condition lasted 105 days, and the entire data set was analyzed to obtain discounting functions for each block of 15 sessions and each food delivery across delay components. Both a hyperbolic-decay model and the generalized matching law described well the choices of LEW and F344 rats. Estimates of discounting rate and sensitivity to the immediacy of reinforcement correlated positively. The slope of the discounting function changed with presentation orders of the delays to the larger reinforcer. Extended training reduced differences between the LEW and F344 rats in discounting rates, sensitivity to the immediacy of reinforcement, and estimates of the area under the curve. We concluded that impulsive choice can change as a function of learning and is not a static property of behavior that is mainly determined by genetic and neurochemical mechanisms. Choosing impulsively may be an advantage for organisms searching for food in rapidly changing environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25862317     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-015-0177-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  59 in total

1.  Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

Authors:  C F Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  When is it adaptive to be patient? A general framework for evaluating delayed rewards.

Authors:  Tim W Fawcett; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats VI: the effects of ethanol and selective serotonergic drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement.

Authors:  J L Evenden; C N Ryan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Strain differences in mesotelencephalic dopaminergic neuronal regulation between Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.

Authors:  S E Lindley; T G Bengoechea; D L Wong; A F Schatzberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1999-06-19       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Effects of acute and repeated nicotine administration on delay discounting in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Karen G Anderson; James W Diller
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Lewis and Fischer rats: a comparison of dopamine transporter and receptors levels.

Authors:  G Flores; G K Wood; D Barbeau; R Quirion; L K Srivastava
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-12-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Functional parameters of delay discounting assessment tasks: order of presentation.

Authors:  Elias Robles; Perla A Vargas
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Good things come to those who wait: attenuated discounting of delayed rewards in aged Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Nicholas W Simon; Candi L LaSarge; Karienn S Montgomery; Matthew T Williams; Ian A Mendez; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting task in rats: Contribution of delay presentation order.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Katherine K Rogers; Benjamin T Gunkel; Nicholas A Prior; Mallory N Hughes; Sara M Sharpe; Hunter L Campbell; Anthony B Johnson; Margaret G Keller; Kerry A Breitenstein; Hansen N Shults
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Using a dependent schedule to measure risky choice in male rats: Effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Nicholas A Prior; Marissa R Chitwood; Haley A Day; Jonah R Heidel; Sarah E Hopkins; Brittany T Muncie; Tatiana A Paradella-Bradley; Alexandra P Sestito; Ashley N Vecchiola; Emily E Wells
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.

Authors:  Justin R Yates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor ligands on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting procedure.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Benjamin T Gunkel; Katherine K Rogers; Mallory N Hughes; Nicholas A Prior
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Effects of GluN2B-selective antagonists on delay and probability discounting in male rats: Modulation by delay/probability presentation order.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Nicholas A Prior; Marissa R Chitwood; Haley A Day; Jonah R Heidel; Sarah E Hopkins; Brittany T Muncie; Tatiana A Paradella-Bradley; Alexandra P Sestito; Ashley N Vecchiola; Emily E Wells
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) uncompetitive antagonists in a delay discounting paradigm using a concurrent-chains procedure.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Benjamin T Gunkel; Katherine K Rogers; Kerry A Breitenstein; Mallory N Hughes; Anthony B Johnson; Sara M Sharpe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Differential effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on risk-based decision making of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Karen G Anderson
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Alexis L Ellis; Karson E Evans; Joy L Kappesser; Kadyn M Lilly; Prodiges Mbambu; Tanner G Sutphin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The association between risky decision making and cocaine conditioned place preference is moderated by sex.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Matthew J Horchar; Joy L Kappesser; Maria R Broderick; Alexis L Ellis; Makayla R Wright
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Trait determinants of impulsive behavior: a comprehensive analysis of 188 rats.

Authors:  Ana Rosa Soares; Madalena Esteves; Pedro Silva Moreira; Ana Margarida Cunha; Marco Rafael Guimarães; Miguel Murteira Carvalho; Catarina Raposo-Lima; Pedro Morgado; Ana Franky Carvalho; Bárbara Coimbra; António Melo; Ana João Rodrigues; António José Salgado; José Miguel Pêgo; João José Cerqueira; Patrício Costa; Nuno Sousa; Armando Almeida; Hugo Leite-Almeida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.