Literature DB >> 16812387

Signal functions in delayed reinforcement.

K A Lattal.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted with pigeons to examine the role of the signal in delay-of-reinforcement procedures. In the first, a blackout accompanying a period of nonreinforcement increased key-peck response rates maintained by immediate reinforcement. The effects of dissociating the blackout from the delay interval were examined in the second experiment. In three conditions, blackouts and unsignaled delays were negatively correlated or occurred randomly with respect to one another. A signaled delay and an unsignaled delay that omitted the blackouts were studied in two other conditions. All delay-of-reinforcement conditions generally produced response rates lower than those produced by immediate reinforcement. Signaled delays maintained higher response rates than did any of the various unsignaled-delay conditions, with or without dissociated blackouts. The effects of these latter conditions did not differ systematically from one another. The final experiment showed that response rates varied as a function of the frequency with which a blackout accompanied delay intervals. By eliminating a number of methodological difficulties present in previous delay-of-reinforcement experiments, these results suggest the importance of the signal in maintaining responding during delay-of-reinforcement procedures and, conversely, the importance of the delay interval in decreasing responding.

Year:  1984        PMID: 16812387      PMCID: PMC1348080          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

Review 1.  DELAYED OF REINFORCEMENT: A HISTORICAL REVIEW.

Authors:  K E RENNER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L R GOLLUB
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

5.  Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

Authors:  D W Schaal; A L Odum; T A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.

Authors:  D W Schaal; K J Schuh; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Adam H Doughty
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Within-session delay-of-reinforcement gradients.

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on variability and repetition of response sequences.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Ryan D Ward; Christopher A Barnes; K Anne Burke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.