Literature DB >> 15762379

Within-subject testing of the signaled-reinforcement effect on operant responding as measured by response rate and resistance to change.

Phil Reed1, Adam H Doughty.   

Abstract

Response rates under random-interval schedules are lower when a brief (500 ms) signal accompanies reinforcement than when there is no signal. The present study examined this signaled-reinforcement effect and its relation to resistance to change. In Experiment 1, rats responded on a multiple random-interval 60-s random-interval 60-s schedule, with signaled reinforcement in only one component. Response resistance to alternative reinforcement, prefeeding, and extinction was compared between these components. Lower response rates, and greater resistance to change, occurred in the component with the reinforcement signal. In Experiment 2, response rates and resistance to change were compared after training on a multiple random-interval 60-s random-interval 60-s schedule in which reinforcer delivery was unsignaled in one component and a response-produced uncorrelated stimulus was presented in the other component. Higher response rates and greater resistance to change occurred with the uncorrelated stimulus. These results highlight the significance of considering the effects of an uncorrelated signal when used as a control condition, and challenge accounts of resistance to change that depend solely on reinforcer rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15762379      PMCID: PMC1193699          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2005.69-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S Holland; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.

Authors:  R C Mellon; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Signal functions in delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of fixed-time shocks and brief stimuli on food-maintained behavior of rats.

Authors:  M Keenan; J C Leslie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Pavlovian contingencies and resistance to change in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  M Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Quasi-reinforcement: control of responding by a percentage-reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A J Neuringer; S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Responding in the cat maintained under response-independent electric shock and response-produced electric shock.

Authors:  L D Byrd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  Resistance to change and frequency of response-dependent stimuli uncorrelated with reinforcement.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Resurgence of behavior during extinction depends on previous rate of response.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Theresa A Morgan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.