Literature DB >> 1402602

Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.

D W Schaal1, K J Schuh, M N Branch.   

Abstract

Key pecking of 4 pigeons was maintained under a multiple variable-interval 20-s variable-interval 120-s schedule of food reinforcement. When rates of key pecking were stable, a 5-s unsignaled, nonresetting delay to reinforcement separated the first peck after an interval elapsed from reinforcement in both components. Rates of pecking decreased substantially in both components. When rates were stable, the situation was changed such that the peck that began the 5-s delay also changed the color of the keylight for 0.5 s (i.e., the delay was briefly signaled). Rates increased to near-immediate reinforcement levels. In subsequent conditions, delays of 10 and 20 s, still briefly signaled, were tested. Although rates of key pecking during the component with the variable-interval 120-s schedule did not change appreciably across conditions, rates during the variable-interval 20-s component decreased greatly in 1 pigeon at the 10-s delay and decreased in all pigeons at the 20-s delay. In a control condition, the variable-interval 20-s schedule with 20-s delays was changed to a variable-interval 35-s schedule with 5-s delays, thus equating nominal rates of reinforcement. Rates of pecking increased to baseline levels. Rates of pecking, then, depended on the value of the briefly signaled delay relative to the programmed interfood times, rather than on the absolute delay value. These results are discussed in terms of similar findings in the literature on conditioned reinforcement, delayed matching to sample, and classical conditioning.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1402602      PMCID: PMC1322060          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

2.  Trace autoshaping: Acquisition, maintenance, and path dependence at long trace intervals.

Authors:  G A Lucas; J D Deich; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Signal functions in delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of different delay of reinforcement procedures on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  C H Pierce; P V Hanford; J Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures.

Authors:  R J Newlin; V M Lolordo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  N Squires; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

Authors:  D W Schaal; A L Odum; T A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; J C Borrero; J S Lalli; D Daniel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

5.  Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training.

Authors:  G P Hanley; B A Iwata; R H Thompson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

6.  A comparison of the effects of brief rules, a timer, and preferred toys on self-control.

Authors:  Matthew H Newquist; Claudia L Dozier; Pamela L Neidert
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

7.  Discrimination of methadone and cocaine by pigeons without explicit discrimination training.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M P McDonald; M A Miller; M P Reilly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.