Literature DB >> 16812205

A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement.

R W Richards.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on either a variable-interval 60-second schedule, or on a schedule that differentially reinforced responses that were spaced at least 20 seconds apart. The birds were then exposed to several durations of reinforcement delay, with comparisons between signaled and unsignaled delays. Although unsignaled delays of 5 and 10 seconds produced large decreases in response rate, signaled delays of up to 10 seconds produced only moderate decreases in response rates. In addition, some subjects responded more rapidly with a .5 or 1.0 second duration of unsignaled delay than with immediate reinforcement. These response rate changes occurred regardless of whether the rate of reinforcement concomitantly decreased or increased.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812205      PMCID: PMC1333033          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

3.  Effects of timeout on spaced responding in pigeons.

Authors:  T J Kramer; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fixed-ratio performance under conditions of delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delayed reinforcement in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of different delay of reinforcement procedures on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  C H Pierce; P V Hanford; J Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  25 in total

1.  Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994

2.  A behaviorist's response to the report of the national commission on excellence in education.

Authors:  B Sulzer-Azaroff
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1985

Review 3.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Within-session delay-of-reinforcement gradients.

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Changes in functional response units with briefly delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  A J Marcattilio; R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Signal functions in delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Handling time and choice in pigeons.

Authors:  S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Briefly delayed reinforcement: An interresponse time analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal; D R Ziegler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.