Literature DB >> 10784005

Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

D W Schaal1, A L Odum, T A Shahan.   

Abstract

In two experiments the conditioned reinforcing and delayed discriminative stimulus functions of stimuli that signal delays to reinforcement were studied. Pigeons' pecks to a center key produced delayed-matching-to-sample trials according to a variable-interval 60-s (or 30-s in 1 pigeon) schedule (Experiment 1) or a multiple variable-interval 20-s variable-interval 120-s schedule (Experiment 2). The trials consisted of a 2-s illumination of one of two sample key colors followed by delays ranging across phases from 0.1 to 27.0 s followed in turn by the presentation of matching and nonmatching comparison stimuli on the side keys. Pecks to the key color that matched the sample were reinforced with 4-s access to grain. Under some conditions of Experiment 1, pecks to nonmatching comparison stimuli produced a 4-s blackout and the start of the next interval. Under other conditions of Experiment 1 and each condition of Experiment 2, pecks to nonmatching stimuli had no effect and trials ended only when pigeons pecked the other, matching stimulus and received food. The functions relating pretrial response rates to delays differed markedly from those relating matching-to-sample accuracy to delays. Specifically, response rates remained relatively high until the longest delays (15.0 to 27.0 s) were arranged, at which point they fell to low levels. Matching accuracy was high at short delays, but fell to chance at delays between 3.0 and 9.0 s. In Experiment 2, both matching accuracy and response rates remained high over a wider range of delays in the variable-interval 120-s component relative to the variable-interval 20-s component. The difference in matching accuracy between the components was not due to an increased tendency in the variable-interval 20-s component toward proactive interference following short intervals. Thus, under these experimental conditions the conditioned reinforcing and the delayed discriminative functions of the sample stimulus depended on the same variables (delay and variable-interval value), but were nevertheless dissociated.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10784005      PMCID: PMC1284767          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.

Authors:  D W Schaal; K J Schuh; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Signal functions in delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the relation between preference and resistance to change.

Authors:  R Grace; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  D W Schaal; T A Shahan; C A Kovera; M P Reilly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Distribution of trials and intertrial retention in delayed matching to sample with pigeons.

Authors:  W A Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1980-07

10.  Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons.

Authors:  W A Roberts; P J Kraemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Jessica Milo; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and private events.

Authors:  John A Nevin
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.

Authors:  Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Delayed matching to sample: reinforcement has opposite effects on resistance to change in two related procedures.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Timothy A Shahan; Amy L Odum; Ryan Ward
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Differential outcomes enhance accuracy of delayed matching to sample but not resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Ryan D Ward; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.