Literature DB >> 14031747

A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

R T KELLEHER, L R GOLLUB.   

Abstract

This review critically analyzes experimental data relevant to the concept of conditioned reinforcement. The review has five sections. Section I is a discussion of the relationship between primary and conditioned reinforcement in terms of chains of stimuli and responses. Section II is a detailed analysis of the conditions in which the component stimuli in chained schedules of reinforcement will become conditioned reinforcers; this section also analyzes studies of token reinforcement, observing responses, switching responses, implicit chained schedules, and higher-order conditioning. Section III analyzes experiments in which potential conditioned reinforcers are used either to prolong responding or to generate responding during experimental extinction. This section discusses hypotheses that have been offered as alternatives to the concept of conditioned reinforcement and hypotheses concerning the necessary and sufficient conditions for establishing a conditioned reinforcer. Section IV discusses other variables that act when a conditioned reinforcer is being established or that act when an established conditioned reinforcer is used to develop or maintain behavior. Section V is a general discussion of conditioned reinforcement. The evidence indicates that the conditioned reinforcing effectiveness of a stimulus is directly related to the frequency of primary reinforcement occurring in its presence, but is independent of the response rate or response pattern occurring in its presence. Results from chained schedules comprised of several components indicate that a stimulus can be established as a conditioned reinforcer by pairing it with an already established conditioned reinforcer rather than a primary reinforcer; however, this type of higher-order conditioning has not been clearly demonstrated with respondent conditioning procedures. Although discriminative stimuli are usually conditioned reinforcers, the available evidence indicates that establishing a stimulus as a discriminative stimulus is not necessary or sufficient for establishing it as a conditioned reinforcer. Discriminative stimuli in chained schedules with several components are not always conditioned reinforcers; stimuli that are simply paired with reinforcers can become conditioned reinforcers. The hypotheses that have been offered as alternatives to the concept of conditioned reinforcement are too limited to integrate the data that exist. The concepts of conditioned reinforcement and chained schedule, however, can be used to integrate the data obtained with diverse techniques. Recent experiments have revealed several techniques for the development of effective conditioned reinforcers. These techniques provide a powerful tool for advancing understanding of conditioned reinforcement and for extending control over behavior.

Keywords:  CONDITIONED LEARNING; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1962        PMID: 14031747      PMCID: PMC1404082          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  57 in total

1.  Sustained performance in rats based on secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  D W ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-06

2.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Secondary reinforcement: a review of recent experimentation.

Authors:  J L MYERS
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The observable unconscious and the inferable conscious in current Soviet psychophysiology: interoceptive conditioning, semantic conditioning, and the orienting reflex.

Authors:  G RAZRAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement.

Authors:  D PREMACK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Stimulus functions in chained fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W T FRY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effectiveness of secondary reinforcing stimuli as a function of the quantity and quality of food reinforcement.

Authors:  C O HOPKINS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-11

8.  On the selective reinforcement of spaced responses.

Authors:  M P WILSON; F S KELLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-06

9.  Sustained performance during very long experimental sessions.

Authors:  B F Skinner; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Intermittent Conditioned Reinforcement in Chimpanzees.

Authors:  R T Kelleher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  147 in total

1.  Progressive-ratio schedules: effects of later schedule requirements on earlier performances.

Authors:  A Baron; A Derenne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus change as a factor in response maintenance with free food available.

Authors:  S R Osborne; M Shelby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Operant conditioning.

Authors:  J E R Staddon; D T Cerutti
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures.

Authors:  Timothy D Hackenberg; Manish Vaidya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  BRAIN-STIMULATION INTENSITY, RATE OF SELF-STIMULATION, AND REINFORCEMENT STRENGTH: AN ANALYSIS THROUGH CHAINING.

Authors:  T D HAWKINS; S S PLISKOFF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  AN AVERSIVE STIMULUS AS A CORRELATED BLOCK COUNTER IN FR PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Animal models of drug craving.

Authors:  A Markou; F Weiss; L H Gold; S B Caine; G Schulteis; G F Koob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  An evaluation of the number of presentations of target sounds during stimulus-stimulus pairing trials.

Authors:  Adriane Miliotis; Tina M Sidener; Kenneth F Reeve; Vincent Carbone; David W Sidener; Lisa Rader; Lara Delmolino
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.