Literature DB >> 11256869

Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm.

C F Aparicio1.   

Abstract

The barrier choice paradigm was used to impose a cost on rats' behavior of traveling between two levers: Pressing on two levers was reinforced with food on concurrent random-interval schedules, but rats had to climb over a barrier to move from one lever to another. The height of the barrier separating the levers was increased from 30.5 to 45.7 cm across two phases that involved various pairs of random-interval schedules. With the 30.5-cm barrier, the generalized matching law showed slopes equal to or slightly above 1.0 for response and time allocation. With the 45.7-cm barrier, the generalized matching law showed slopes above 1.2 for responses, indicating that sensitivity to reinforcement increased with increasing barrier height. For time allocation the slopes remained close to 1.0; sensitivity to reinforcement did not seem to increase with increasing barrier height. The role of locomotion effort in choice situations is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11256869      PMCID: PMC1284810          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay.

Authors:  A Silberberg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice, changeover, and travel.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; J G Fetterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent schedules: Spatial separation of response alternatives.

Authors:  H Boelens; P F Kop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Optimality And Concurrent Variable-interval Variable-ratio Schedules.

Authors:  W Baum; C Aparicio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An application of the matching law to social dynamics.

Authors:  John C Borrero; Stephany S Crisolo; Qiuchen Tu; Weston A Rieland; Noël A Ross; Monica T Francisco; Kenny Y Yamamoto
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

3.  Dynamics of choice: relative rate and amount affect local preference at three different time scales.

Authors:  Carlos F Aparicio; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Carlos F Aparicio; Mirari Elcoro; Benigno Alonso-Alvarez
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.

Authors:  Carlos F Aparicio; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of the dopamine depleting agent tetrabenazine on detailed temporal parameters of effort-related choice responding.

Authors:  Naxin Ren; Carla Carratala-Ros; Alev Ecevitoglu; Renee A Rotolo; Gayle A Edelstein; Rose E Presby; Ian H Stevenson; James J Chrobak; John D Salamone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.215

Review 7.  Feeding behavior, obesity, and neuroeconomics.

Authors:  Neil E Rowland; Cheryl H Vaughan; Clare M Mathes; Anaya Mitra
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-15

8.  Applicability to foraging simulation of a reinforcement schedule controlling the response energy of pigeons.

Authors:  Masanori Kono
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Feeder Approach between Trials Is Increased by Uncertainty and Affects Subsequent Choices.

Authors:  Aaron J Gruber; Rajat Thapa; Sienna H Randolph
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-01-08

10.  Dopamine, behavioral economics, and effort.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Andrew M Farrar; Eric J Nunes; Marta Pardo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.