Literature DB >> 16812121

Temporal distributions of responding during discrete-trial omission training in rats.

M F O'connell.   

Abstract

Within-session temporal distributions of responding were investigated in three experiments using rats pressing a lever in a discrete-trial omission procedure. This schedule entailed 60, one-minute trials, and a sucrose solution was made available at the end of each trial in which no lever press occurred. In Experiment I, nonnaive rats acquired and maintained responding during this training. Moreover, the probability of a response during any session showed a strong and reliable tendency to increase from the beginning to the end of the session. These results were replicated in Experiment II, using naive animals. In Experiment III, alterations were made in the training procedure, including elimination of response-contingent and noncontingent stimulus changes. Results indicate that stimulus change may be sufficient to maintain low levels of responding whether or not this change is contingent on responding.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 16812121      PMCID: PMC1332787          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  "Automaintenance": the role of reinforcement.

Authors:  S R Hursh; D J Navarick; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.

Authors:  F J Barrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Responding under positive and negative response contingencies in pigeons and crows.

Authors:  R W Powell; W Kelly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Associative interaction: joint control of key pecking by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships.

Authors:  G Woodruff; N Conner; E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.

Authors:  G D Eldridge; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Matthew T Sitomer; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The attribution of incentive salience to Pavlovian alcohol cues: a shift from goal-tracking to sign-tracking.

Authors:  Chandra S Srey; Jean-Marie N Maddux; Nadia Chaudhri
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Animal emotion: Descriptive and prescriptive definitions and their implications for a comparative perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Paul; Michael T Mendl
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.448

7.  Examining affective structure in chickens: valence, intensity, persistence and generalization measured using a Conditioned Place Preference Test.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Paul; Joanne L Edgar; Gina Caplen; Christine J Nicol
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.448

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.