Literature DB >> 8283153

Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

F K McSweeney1, J M Roll.   

Abstract

When the procedure is held constant within an experimental session, responding often changes systematically within that session. Many of these within-session changes in responding cannot be dismissed as learning curves or by-products of satiation. They have been observed in studies of positive reinforcement, avoidance, punishment, extinction, discrimination, delayed matching to sample, concept formation, maze and alley running, and laboratory analogues of foraging, as well as in the unconditioned substrates of conditioned behavior. When aversive stimuli are used, responding usually increases early in the session. When positive reinforcers are used, responding changes in a variety of ways, including increasing, decreasing, and bitonic functions. Both strong and minimal reinforcement procedures produce within-session decreases in positively reinforced behavior. Within-session changes in responding have substantial theoretical and methodological implications for research in conditioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8283153      PMCID: PMC1322170          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  114 in total

1.  A RECONSIDERATION OF THE EXTINCTION HYPOTHESIS OF WARM UP IN MOTOR BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  M P FELDMAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The stability of operant level and its relation to deprivation.

Authors:  E F SEGAL
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-12

4.  Successive acquisitions and extinctions as related to percentage of reinforcement.

Authors:  G D JENSEN; J W COTTON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-07

5.  Response rate, latency, and resistance to change.

Authors:  S J Fath; L Fields; M K Malott; D Grossett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus generalization as a function of the delay between training and testing procedures: a reevaluation.

Authors:  D R Thomas; D E Burr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning.

Authors:  J J ANTONITIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-10

8.  Signal-to-noise ratio as a predictor of startle amplitude and habituation in the rat.

Authors:  M Davis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-05

9.  Arousal: its genesis and manifestation as response rate.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S J Hanson; S R Osborne
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Modification of eating and drinking: interactions between chemical agent, deprivation state, and site of stimulation.

Authors:  R R Hutchinson; J W Renfrew
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-06
View more
  20 in total

1.  Criticisms of the satiety hypothesis as an explanation for within-session decreases in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; E S Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research.

Authors:  Eric S Murphy; Frances K McSweeney; Richard G Smith; Jennifer J McComas
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Extinction revisited: similarities between extinction and reductions in US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbit's nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  E James Kehoe; Natasha E White
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

4.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2004

5.  Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll; J N Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Within-session changes in key and lever pressing for water during several multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of reinforcement amount on attack induced under a fixed-interval schedule in pigeons.

Authors:  R C Pitts; E F Malagodi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Measuring resistance to change at the within-session level.

Authors:  François Tonneau; Américo Ríos; Felipe Cabrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcer value may change within experimental sessions.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J N Weatherly; S Swindell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.