Literature DB >> 16811623

Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

B Schwartz, D R Williams.   

Abstract

Pigeons emitted almost exclusively short-duration key pecks (shorter than 20 msec) when on negative automaintenance procedures, in which pecks prevented reinforcement. Peck durations under fixed-interval and fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules were generally two to five times longer than pecks under a negative automaintenance schedule. However, initial key pecks were of short duration, independent of procedure. The frequency of short-duration pecks was insensitive to differential reinforcement, while the frequency of long-duration pecks was sensitive to differential reinforcement. It is proposed that short-duration pecks arise from the pigeon's normal feeding pattern and are directly enhanced by food presentation, while long-duration pecks are controlled by the contingent effects of food presentation. The implications of the existence of two classes of pecks for the functional definition of operants and the separation of phylogenetic and ontogenetic sources of control of key pecking are discussed.

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811623      PMCID: PMC1334004          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Aversive control with the pigeon.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Operants.

Authors:  K Schick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Training and maintenance of keypecking in the pigeon by negative reinforcement.

Authors:  H Rachlin; P N Hineline
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-08-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Modification of a visceral response, salivation in thirsty dogs, by instrumental training with water reward.

Authors:  N E Miller; A Carmona
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-02

10.  The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  36 in total

1.  Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.

Authors:  A Poling; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  From molecular to molar: a paradigm shift in behavior analysis.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of varying the percentage of key illuminations paired with food in a positive automaintenance procedure.

Authors:  F A Gonzalez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Studies of operant and reflexive key pecks in the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Development of complex, stereotyped behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  K Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).

Authors:  C C Perkins; W O Beavers; R A Hancock; P C Hemmendinger; D Hemmendinger; J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Punishment of autoshaped key-peck responses of pigeons.

Authors:  R K Wesp; K A Lattal; A D Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.