Literature DB >> 16812003

Punishment of autoshaped key-peck responses of pigeons.

R K Wesp, K A Lattal, A D Poling.   

Abstract

The effects of different voltages of response-dependent and response-independent electric shock on the frequency of key-peck responses engendered by an autoshaping procedure were studied. In Experiments I and II, each response produced a brief electric shock, and response frequency generally decreased more with higher-voltage shock. Preshock frequencies of responding were generally recovered across successive sessions of relatively low-voltage shock delivery but not at higher shock voltages. The effects of response-dependent and response-independent shock were compared in Experiment III by using a yoked-control procedure in which each pigeon received each type of shock delivery at different times. Response-dependent shock generally produced greater decreases in response frequency. In the final experiment, one response-independent shock per autoshaping trial was scheduled. The number of autoshaped responses per trial was related to shock voltages. These results suggest that response-dependent and response-independent electric shock effectively decrease frequency of autoshaped responses.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812003      PMCID: PMC1333571          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  A comparison of several procedures for eliminating behavior.

Authors:  W C HOLZ; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Eliminating behavior with reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.

Authors:  J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Enhancement of off-key pecking by on-key punishment.

Authors:  P J Dunham; A Mariner; H Adams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Overcoming the effects of prior punishment on interspecies aggression in the rat.

Authors:  R Baenninger; R R Ulm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-12

9.  Some effects of punishment on pain-elicited aggression.

Authors:  R Baenninger; J C Grossman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.

Authors:  A Poling; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Automaintenance in guinea pigs: effects of feeding regimen and omission training.

Authors:  A Poling; T Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Suppression of ethanol-reinforced lever pressing by delaying food availability.

Authors:  A Poling; T Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The "where is it?" reflex: autoshaping the orienting response.

Authors:  G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.