Literature DB >> 16812086

Automaintenance in guinea pigs: effects of feeding regimen and omission training.

A Poling, T Poling.   

Abstract

Behavior maintained by stimulus-reinforcer pairings was examined. Guinea pigs maintained at 85 per cent of free-feeding weights reliably contacted a retractable lever presented before delivery of a single piece of guinea-pig chow or a 45-milligram guinea-pig pellet. When animals were given free access to one food and received the second food preceded by the lever, contact responses persisted. Such responses seldom occurred when a single food was freely available and was also delivered after lever presentation. Introduction of an omission training (negative automaintenance) procedure, in which lever contacts resulted in lever retraction and prevented food delivery, strongly reduced lever contacts. Observation indicated that mouthing the food cup, instead of the lever, became the prominent behavior during the prefood stimulus under the omission training procedure.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812086      PMCID: PMC1332730          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  Rate and temporal pattern of key pecking under autoshaping and omission schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J D Deich; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The associative relation underlying autoshaping in the pigeon.

Authors:  G Woodruff; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.

Authors:  F J Barrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Operant conditioning in the guinea pig.

Authors:  M R Petersen; C A Prosen; D B Moody; W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Operant conditioning in nondeprived adult and infant guinea pigs.

Authors:  J C Berryman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Autoshaping and automaintenance of a key-press response in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Schwam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Autoshaping, random control, and omission training in the rat.

Authors:  C Locurto; H S Terrace; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Drug effects on the performance of pigeons under a negative automaintenance schedule.

Authors:  A Poling; J B Appel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-01-31       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Matthew T Sitomer; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The control of responding by sounds: unusual effect of reinforcement.

Authors:  J M Harrison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus-food pairings produce stimulus-directed touch-screen responding in cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fascicularis) with or without a positive response contingency.

Authors:  Christopher E Bullock; Todd M Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.