Literature DB >> 16811898

Choice and the rate of punishment in concurrent schedules.

M Z Deluty.   

Abstract

Rats' responses on two levers were reinforced according to independent random-interval 1.5-min food schedules. In addition, both lever presses were intermittently punished according to several concurrent random-interval random-interval shock schedules. For the left, the scheduled rate of punishment was kept constant according to a random-interval 6-min schedule. For the right, the rate of punishment varied. As the frequency of punishment for the right lever press increased, its rate decreased. The rate of the left punished lever press increased, however, even though its scheduled reinforcement rate and punishment rate remained unchanged.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811898      PMCID: PMC1333417          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  PROPERTIES OF BEHAVIOR UNDER RANDOM INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.

Authors:  J FARMER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.

Authors:  D M BRETHOWER; G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Random interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Hunger and contrast in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Punished and unpunished responding in multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  C Tullis; G Walters
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Toward a quantitative theory of punishment.

Authors:  P A de Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise.

Authors:  T M McAdie; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A Bouzas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effects of response cost and response restriction on a multiple-response repertoire with humans.

Authors:  J Crosbie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  I W Hunter; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models.

Authors:  J Farley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Time-allocation matching between punishing situations.

Authors:  M Z Deluty; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Mathematical models and the experimental analysis of behavior.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Preference for less frequent shock under fixed-interval schedules of electric-shock presentation.

Authors:  R C Pitts; E F Malagodi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.