Literature DB >> 16812047

Time-allocation matching between punishing situations.

M Z Deluty, R M Church.   

Abstract

In the presence and absence of white noise, response-independent aversive events were delivered to rats according to several variable-time electric-shock schedules. The animals could switch from the noise component to the no-noise component and vice versa by making a single lever-press response. If the schedule in one component was not in operation when the animal was in the other component, the proportion of time allocated to one component equalled or matched the proportion of obtained punishers in the other component. If both schedules were always in operation, minimizing tended to occur: the animals allocated almost all of their time to the component having the lower shock rate. An analysis of these results, in terms of the expected time until an aversive event, is presented.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812047      PMCID: PMC1332747          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; T G Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A J Brownstein; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Formal properties of the matching law.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Time allocation on concurrent schedules with asymmetrical response requirements.

Authors:  R A Bauman; R L Shull; A J Brownstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Time-based and count-based measurement of preference.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Quantitative hedonism.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models.

Authors:  J Farley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice between fixed-interval schedules: Graded versus step-like choice functions.

Authors:  R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Timeout from concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Quantification of ethanol's antipunishment effect in humans using the generalized matching equation.

Authors:  Erin B Rasmussen; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of point-loss punishers on human signal-detection performance.

Authors:  Celia Lie; Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice.

Authors:  Erin B Rasmussen; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Punishment in human choice: direct or competitive suppression?

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Elliott M Paletz; Kenneth R MacAleese; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.