Literature DB >> 16812111

The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules.

A Bouzas.   

Abstract

Key pecking of four birds was reinforced with food according to a two-component multiple variable-interval 1-minute variable-interval 4-minute schedule. In addition, key pecking was punished by a brief shock according to a variable-interval 30-second schedule during both components of the multiple schedule. The intensity of the shock was varied. For all birds, punishment had a stronger suppressive effect on the responding maintained by the leaner food schedule, and the ratio of responding during the two components of the multiple schedule became closer to the ratio of reinforcement as shock intensity was increased, as the relative law of effect predicts. At the higher shock intensity, there was some evidence that the ratio of responses overmatched the ratio of reinforcements.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812111      PMCID: PMC1332775          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.

Authors:  D M BRETHOWER; G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and the rate of punishment in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Z Deluty
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Recovery of responses during mild punishment.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Punished and unpunished responding in multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  C Tullis; G Walters
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Punishment and rate of positive reinforcement.

Authors:  W C Holz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Influence of the schedule of positive reinforcement on punished behavior.

Authors:  R M Church; G A Raymond
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-04
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Resistance to change and the law of effect.

Authors:  D N Harper; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response rate, latency, and resistance to change.

Authors:  S J Fath; L Fields; M K Malott; D Grossett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to reinforcement change in multiple and concurrent schedules assessed in transition and at steady state.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response-independent food delivery and behavioral resistance to change.

Authors:  D N Harper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A P McLean; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.

Authors:  William Rodríguez; Arturo Bouzas; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Tests of behavior momentum in simple and multiple schedules with rats and pigeons.

Authors:  S L Cohen; D S Riley; P A Weigle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Comparing pleasure and pain: the fundamental mathematical equivalence of reward gain and shock reduction under variable interval schedules.

Authors:  Dave E W Mallpress; Tim W Fawcett; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.