Literature DB >> 5645870

Punished and unpunished responding in multiple variable-interval schedules.

C Tullis, G Walters.   

Abstract

The performance of rats trained on multiple variable-interval schedules was examined before, during, and after punishment. The same linear function related relative response rates to relative density of reinforcement both in the presence and absence of punishment. Equal relative suppression was seen in both the high and low reinforcement density components. The intercept value of the function was zero. Each component of the schedule was programmed on a separate lever: thus during any component, there was an opportunity for responses on the nonoperative lever (errors). The proportions of these errors declined to a near-zero value during punishment and did not regain their prepunishment values after punishment was removed, suggesting that some discrimination learning occurred during punishment. Recovery of response rate during punishment was seen only where a greater-than-zero probability of reinforcement was associated with the response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5645870      PMCID: PMC1338463          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Punishment and shock intensity.

Authors:  J B APPEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  STRESS-INDUCED BREAKDOWN OF AN APPETITIVE DISCRIMINATION.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  PUNISHMENT: EFFECTS OF SHOCK INTENSITY ON RESPONSE SUPPRESSION.

Authors:  J B APPEL; N J PETERSON
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-06

4.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Punishment during fixed-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Sequential effects of punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Counter conditioning in an operant conflict situation.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Barry
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

8.  Influence of the schedule of positive reinforcement on punished behavior.

Authors:  R M Church; G A Raymond
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1967-04
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A Bouzas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative frequency of reinforcement and rate of punished behavior.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and the rate of punishment in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Z Deluty
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Intermittent punishment of human responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S R Scobie; A Kaufman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol enhances food reinforcement in a mouse operant conflict test.

Authors:  Maria Flavia Barbano; Anna Castañé; Elena Martín-García; Rafael Maldonado
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.