Literature DB >> 16673829

Mathematical models and the experimental analysis of behavior.

James E Mazur1.   

Abstract

The use of mathematical models in the experimental analysis of behavior has increased over the years, and they offer several advantages. Mathematical models require theorists to be precise and unambiguous, often allowing comparisons of competing theories that sound similar when stated in words. Sometimes different mathematical models may make equally accurate predictions for a large body of data. In such cases, it is important to find and investigate situations for which the competing models make different predictions because, unless two models are actually mathematically equivalent, they are based on different assumptions about the psychological processes that underlie an observed behavior. Mathematical models developed in basic behavioral research have been used to predict and control behavior in applied settings, and they have guided research in other areas of psychology. A good mathematical model can provide a common framework for understanding what might otherwise appear to be diverse and unrelated behavioral phenomena. Because psychologists vary in their quantitative skills and in their tolerance for mathematical equations, it is important for those who develop mathematical models of behavior to find ways (such as verbal analogies, pictorial representations, or concrete examples) to communicate the key premises of their models to nonspecialists.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16673829      PMCID: PMC1472627          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.65-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  35 in total

1.  Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Authors:  G Ainslie
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fixed-ratio level pressing by VMH rats: work vs accessibility of sucrose reward.

Authors:  J E Kelsey; J Allison
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1976-11

6.  An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The Matching Law And Amount-dependent Exponential Discounting As Accounts Of Self-control Choice.

Authors:  R Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Toward a quantitative theory of punishment.

Authors:  P A de Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Predicting drug use: application of behavioral theories of choice.

Authors:  C J Correia; J Simons; K B Carey; B E Borsari
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  28 in total

1.  Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k.

Authors:  Amy L Odum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent-chains schedules as a method to study choice between alcohol-associated conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Neural circuitry and mechanisms of waiting impulsivity: relevance to addiction.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Dalley; Karen D Ersche
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.

Authors:  Edmund Fantino; Paul Romanowich
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effect of reinforcer magnitude on performance maintained by progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J F Rickard; S Body; Z Zhang; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Unidirectional relationship between heroin self-administration and impulsive decision-making in rats.

Authors:  Maria C Schippers; Rob Binnekade; Anton N M Schoffelmeer; Tommy Pattij; Taco J De Vries
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Effect of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on performance on a progressive ratio schedule.

Authors:  Lourdes Valencia-Torres; C M Bradshaw; Arturo Bouzas; Enrique Hong; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Federico Sanabria; Igor Dolgov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

10.  Choice between reinforcer delays versus choice between reinforcer magnitudes: differential Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  S da Costa Araújo; S Body; L Valencia Torres; C M Olarte Sanchez; V K Bak; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.