Literature DB >> 4838198

Hunger and contrast in a multiple schedule.

R J Herrnstein, D H Loveland.   

Abstract

Pigeons working for food on a multiple variable-interval 1-min-variable-interval 4-min schedule were subjected to variations in body weight, presumably causing changes in hunger. The proportion of responses in each component approached and eventually reached the proportion of reinforcements as body weight increased. This effect follows from the matching-law interpretation of contrast in multiple schedules.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4838198      PMCID: PMC1333224          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The law of effect and avoidance: a quantitative relationship between response rate and shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  P A De Villiers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Formal properties of the matching law.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Variability of responding on a concurrent schedule as a function of body weight.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Quantitative hedonism.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 4.791

7.  Animals respond for food in the presence of free food.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  24 in total

1.  Choice for response alternatives differing in reinforcement frequency in dopamine D2 receptor mutant and Swiss-Webster mice.

Authors:  Paul L Soto; Takato Hiranita; David K Grandy; Jonathan L Katz
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  On the effects of component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  L Charman; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Variation in Herrnstein's r(o) as a function of alternative reinforcement rate.

Authors:  J D Dougan; F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  A Bouzas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Performance in continuously available multiple schedules.

Authors:  D Elliffe; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Resistance to reinforcement change in multiple and concurrent schedules assessed in transition and at steady state.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response strength in multiple periodic and aperiodic schedules.

Authors:  C Mandell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching in a network.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Choice and the rate of punishment in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Z Deluty
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.