Literature DB >> 13872895

A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.

D M BRETHOWER, G S REYNOLDS.   

Abstract

The key pecking of two pigeons was reinforced on a variable-interval schedule of reinforcement during the presentation of each of two stimuli. In various phases of the experiment, punishment followed every response emitted in the presence of one of the stimuli. In general, when the rate of punished responding changed during the presentation of one stimulus, the rate of unpunished responding during the other stimulus changed in the opposite direction. This sort of change in rate is an example of behavioral contrast. When punishment was introduced, the rate of punished responding decreased and the rate of unpunished responding increased as functions of shock intensity. When the rate of previously punished responding increased after the termination of the shock, the rate of the always unpunished responding decreased. When the procedure correlated with a red key was changed from variable-interval reinforcement and punishment for each response to extinction and no punishment, the rate of reinforced responding during presentations of a green key decreased and then increased while the rate of the previously punished responding during red first increased and then decreased during extinction.

Keywords:  LEARNING; PUNISHMENT

Mesh:

Year:  1962        PMID: 13872895      PMCID: PMC1404118          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contrast, generalization, and the process of discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total
  52 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  STRESS-INDUCED BREAKDOWN OF AN APPETITIVE DISCRIMINATION.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  G A WERTHEIM
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Errorless transfer of a discrimination across two continua.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral engineering: postural control by a portable operant apparatus.

Authors:  N Azrin; H Rubin; F O'brien; T Ayllon; D Roll
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

7.  Generalization of punishment effects-a case study.

Authors:  J S Birnbrauer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

8.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Generalization of conditioned suppression after differential training.

Authors:  D P Hendry; R Switalski; M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats.

Authors:  K Alling; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.