Literature DB >> 16811812

Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli.

E A Wasserman, P A Anderson.   

Abstract

The learning by hungry pigeons of a discrimination between two successively presented compound visual stimuli was investigated using a two-key autoshaping procedure. Common and distinctive stimulus elements were simultaneously presented on separate keys and either followed by food delivery, S+, or not, S-. The subjects acquired both between-trial and within-trial discriminations. On S+ trials, pigeons pecked the distinctive stimulus more than the common stimulus; before responding ceased on S- trials, they pecked the common stimulus more than the distinctive one. Mastery of the within-display discrimination during S+ trials preceded mastery of the between-trials discrimination. These findings extend the Jenkins-Sainsbury analysis of discriminations based upon a single distinguishing feature to discriminations in which common and distinctive elements are associated with both the positive and negative discriminative stimuli. The similarity of these findings to other effects found in autoshaping-approach to signals that forecast reinforcement and withdrawal from signals that forecast nonreinforcement-is also discussed.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811812      PMCID: PMC1333297          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  Controls for and constraints on auto-shaping.

Authors:  J Bilbrey; S Winokur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for food.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The disruption of autoshaped key pecking in the pigeon by food-tray illumination.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; S B McCracken
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pavlovian conditioning with heat reinforcement produces stimulus-directed pecking in chicks.

Authors:  E A Wasserman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; S R Franklin; E Hearst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-04

9.  Discrimination of compound stimuli involving the presence or absence of a distinctive visual feature.

Authors:  G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Monitoring same/different discrimination behavior in time and space: finding differences and anticipatory discrimination behavior.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

2.  Autoshaping with common and distinctive stimulus elements, compact and dispersed arrays.

Authors:  S E Sperling; M E Perkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Fading and errorless transfer in successive discriminations.

Authors:  L Fields
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus generalization from feeder to response key in the acquisition of autoshaped pecking.

Authors:  S E Sperling; M E Perkins; H J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The nature of discrimination learning in pigeons.

Authors:  John M Pearce; Guillem R Esber; David N George; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 6.  The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

8.  Subsampling of cues in associative learning.

Authors:  Omar D Perez; Edgar H Vogel; Sanjay Narasiwodeyar; Fabian A Soto
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.699

9.  Active change detection by pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Carl Erick Hagmann; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-07-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.