Literature DB >> 16812007

Stimulus generalization from feeder to response key in the acquisition of autoshaped pecking.

S E Sperling, M E Perkins, H J Duncan.   

Abstract

During autoshaping, a 6-second presentation of one stimulus and a variable time 30-second presentation of a second stimulus alternated in appearance on a pigeon key. Grain always was delivered for 3 seconds at the end of the first stimulus interval. In the first experiment, autoshaped pecking of the stimulus preceding grain delivery began much sooner when that stimulus was a black vertical line on a white background and the other stimulus was green than when the opposite stimulus arrangement was used. Because these two stimuli differed in form, hue, brightness, and similarity in hue and brightness to the illumination of the raised feeder, three subsequent experiments examined whether the differential speed of autoshaping in the two groups was due to a feature-positive, feature-negative effect, a preference for brighter over darker stimuli, a simple preference for white over green, or stimulus generalization from the brightness or hue of the illuminated, raised feeder to the stimulus on the key preceding grain delivery. The data from these experiments showed that the first autoshaped key peck was most likely to be made to the stimulus of the same hue as that illuminating the feeder, regardless of whether that stimulus was positively or negatively associated with grain delivery. At least under some conditions, therefore, stimulus-generalization mediated response transfer of pecking grain in the presence of the hue illuminating the feeder to pecking the key illuminated by a similar hue appears to account for the occurrence of autoshaped key pecking.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812007      PMCID: PMC1333576          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).

Authors:  C C Perkins; W O Beavers; R A Hancock; P C Hemmendinger; D Hemmendinger; J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.

Authors:  J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Acquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer; G H Davol; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; P A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Autoshaping with common and distinctive stimulus elements, compact and dispersed arrays.

Authors:  S E Sperling; M E Perkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A direct fluid delivery system for the pigeon.

Authors:  G A Lucas; A Vodraska; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Autoshaped responding: A baseline for studying stimulus preference.

Authors:  A C Catania; M C Owens; V Von Lossberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast and the automaintained key peck.

Authors:  R K Wesp; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Acquisition and maintenance of autoshaped key pecking as a function of food stimulus and key stimulus similarity.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Federico Sanabria; Igor Dolgov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.