Literature DB >> 32440645

Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Stephanie P da Silva1, April Michele Williams2.   

Abstract

Stimulus-stimulus pairing (SSP) is a procedure used by behavior analysis practitioners that capitalizes on respondent conditioning processes to elicit vocalizations. These procedures usually are implemented only after other, more customary methods (e.g., standard echoic training via modeling) have been exhausted. Unfortunately, SSP itself has mixed research support, probably because certain as-yet-unidentified procedural variations are more effective than others. Even when SSP produces (or increases) vocalizations, its effects can be short-lived. Although specific features of SSP differ across published accounts, fundamental characteristics include presentation of a vocal stimulus proximal with presentation of a preferred item. In the present article, we draw parallels between SSP procedures and autoshaping, review factors shown to affect autoshaping, and interpret autoshaping research for suggested SSP tests and applications. We then call for extended use and reporting of SSP in behavior-analytic treatments. Finally, three bridges created by this article are identified: basic-applied, respondent-operant, and behavior analysis with other sciences. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2019.

Keywords:  Autoshaping; Classical conditioning; Respondent conditioning; Stimulus–stimulus pairing; Translational research; Verbal behavior

Year:  2019        PMID: 32440645      PMCID: PMC7198677          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  140 in total

1.  Augmentation of taste conditioning by a preconditioned odor.

Authors:  W R Batsell; J D Batson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-07

2.  Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing of Vocalizations: A Systematic Replication.

Authors:  Lisa Rader; Tina M Sidener; Kenneth F Reeve; David W Sidener; Lara Delmolino; Adriane Miliotis; Vincent Carbone
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2014-03-22

4.  Evaluating stimulus-stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement in the establishment of an echoic repertoire of children diagnosed with autism.

Authors:  Barbara E Esch; James E Carr; Jack Michael
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2005

5.  Using stimulus-stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement to teach vocal verbal behavior to young children with autism.

Authors:  Regina A Carroll; Kevin P Klatt
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2008

6.  Effects of operant discrimination training on the vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism.

Authors:  Tracy L Lepper; Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir; Barbara E Esch
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2013-06-03

7.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping.

Authors:  P J Durlach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-10

9.  Individual variation in the motivational properties of a nicotine cue: sign-trackers vs. goal-trackers.

Authors:  Lindsay M Yager; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Blocking in autoshaped lever-pressing procedures with rats.

Authors:  Peter C Holland; Judith S A Asem; Connor P Galvin; Caitlin Hepps Keeney; Melanie Hsu; Alexandra Miller; Vivian Zhou
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.