Literature DB >> 16811710

Controls for and constraints on auto-shaping.

J Bilbrey, S Winokur.   

Abstract

Auto-shaping the pigeon's key-peck response was examined as a respondent conditioning procedure with the use of Rescorla's truly-random control procedure. In the first experiment, pigeons received presentations of brief light on the response key and brief presentations of food where the light and the food were independently presented. All birds failed to key peck after many light and food presentations, but explicit pairing of the light and food rapidly conditioned pecking to the light. Experiment 2 showed that even when an independent light/food presentation schedule was reduced to variable-time 30 sec, additional naive birds would not key peck and only one bird pecked when the schedules were variable-time 15 sec. A third experiment examined an explicit-unpairing control procedure, where the light and food were not only presented on independent schedules but were also separated by a minimum time, and found that auto-shaping did not occur. A fourth experiment investigated a number of control procedures and found them ineffective. A fifth experiment investigated the effects of a physical separation of the locus of the response key and the food dispenser, and a sixth experiment investigated using a tone in place of the light. It was concluded that pecking is generated by auto-shaping procedures only when an intermittently presented keylight is regularly paired with food.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811710      PMCID: PMC1334156          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  A second type of superstition in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-06

2.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Acquisition of Key-Pecking via Autoshaping as a Function of Prior Experience: "Learned Laziness"?

Authors:  L A Engberg; G Hansen; R L Welker; D R Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Some factors involved in the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  W H MORSE; B F SKINNER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Conditioned Approach and Contact Behavior toward Signals for Food or Brain-Stimulation Reinforcement.

Authors:  G B Peterson; J E Ackilt; G P Frommer; E S Hearst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  The role of preliminary magazine training in acquisition of the autoshaped key peck.

Authors:  G H Davol; G D Steinhauer; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Second-order schedules with paired auditory brief stimuli.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Control of responding during stimuli that precede transitions in reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  M G Ortega; H Marcucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Acquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer; G H Davol; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Signal-controlled responding.

Authors:  P Lewis; M Stoyak
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures.

Authors:  R J Newlin; V M Lolordo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Differential autoshaping to common and distinctive elements of positive and negative discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; P A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A procedure for autoshaping the pigeon's key peck to an auditory stimulus.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer; G H Davol; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Autoshaping, random control, and omission training in the rat.

Authors:  C Locurto; H S Terrace; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Autoshaping in the rat: The effects of localizable visual and auditory signals for food.

Authors:  G G Cleland; G C Davey
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.