Literature DB >> 16811727

The role of autopecking in behavioral contrast.

M E Redford, C C Perkins.   

Abstract

Four groups of four pigeons each were studied on two different multiple schedules. The cues correlated with the schedule components were localized on the response key for two groups and were not localized for the others. Two groups worked on multiple schedules with variable interval 15-sec in both components, and variable interval 15-sec in one component and extinction in the other. The other two groups had identical procedures except that food was presented on a response-independent variable-time schedule. Variable-interval birds with localized stimuli showed marked behavioral contrast; variable-interval birds with non-localized stimuli showed no behavioral contrast. Variable-time birds with key-light stimuli acquired high rates of autopecking, which changed as treatment changed in a manner that paralleled rate changes, resulting in behavioral contrast for variable-interval birds. Variable-time birds with non-localized stimuli key pecked only at a low rate. The findings indicate that behavioral contrast in pigeons may result from the autopecking that is obtained with stimulus-contingent food presentation.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811727      PMCID: PMC1333177          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  16 in total

1.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Line-orientation generalization following signalled-reinforcer training.

Authors:  P Griffin; D J Stewart
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping).

Authors:  C C Perkins; W O Beavers; R A Hancock; P C Hemmendinger; D Hemmendinger; J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Key-peck durations under behavioral contrast and differential reinforcement.

Authors:  W R Whipple; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interactions in multiple schedules: negative induction with squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Behavioral contrast with multiple positive and negative stimuli on a continuum.

Authors:  G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral contrast in rats with different reinforcers and different response topographies.

Authors:  R J Beninger; S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.