Literature DB >> 16812185

Key-peck durations under behavioral contrast and differential reinforcement.

W R Whipple, E Fantino.   

Abstract

Pigeons were maintained on a multiple schedule in which both components were variable-interval one-minute schedules. When they were switched to a condition in which one component was extinction, behavioral contrast was observed. The median durations of the key pecks in the unchanged component did not decrease in size. The results are incompatible with a theory of behavioral contrast which considers the added pecks to be short-duration responses. In a second experiment, pigeons were required to emit short-duration key pecks in one component of a multiple schedule, and long-duration pecks in the other. Two of three pigeons learned to emit responses appropriate to the requirements of the component in effect, suggesting that the duration of the key-peck response is sensitive to differential reinforcement.

Year:  1980        PMID: 16812185      PMCID: PMC1332994          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  K Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The role of autopecking in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  M E Redford; C C Perkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  "Automaintenance": the role of reinforcement.

Authors:  S R Hursh; D J Navarick; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavioral contrast in the pigeon: a study of the duration of key pecking maintained on multiple schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Schwartz; B Hamilton; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Changeover delay effects on topographically tagged discriminative behavior.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Dissecting the conditioned pecking response: an integrated system for the analysis of pecking response parameters.

Authors:  R Bermejo; D Houben; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.