Literature DB >> 16811943

Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability.

B A Williams.   

Abstract

Pigeons were studied on a three-component multiple schedule where all reinforcement was independent of responding. Two components were cued by different keylights and were associated with different rates of reinforcement. The third was always a no-key period associated with extinction. After a few sessions, pecking was elicited by the keylights signalling the reinforcement and continued to be maintained indefinitely. The duration and sequence of the three components were varied to determine if the primary controlling variable was differences in the overall probability of reinforcement, or if it was the immediate change in reinforcement signalled by the onset and/or offset of the stimulus. Both variables were found to control behavior. When 30-sec components were used, the primary controlling variable was the overall probability of reinforcement, but when 3-min components were used, overall probability had little effect. Control by local changes in reinforcement also occurred, although the type of local control varied both across subjects and experimental conditions. Some behaviors were controlled more by the change in reinforcement signalled by the onset of the stimulus, while others were controlled more by the change signalled by the offset of the stimulus.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811943      PMCID: PMC1333508          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  RATE-CHANGE EFFECTS WITH EQUAL POTENTIAL REINFORCEMENTS DURING THE "WARNING" STIMULUS.

Authors:  S S PLISKOFF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast in one component of a multiple schedule as a function of the reinforcement conditions operating in the following component.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R A Gay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A re-examination of local contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  S L Buck; B Rothstein; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  R L Menlove
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Rate-change effects during a pre-schedule-change stimulus.

Authors:  S PLISKOFF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  7 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast: Pavlovian effects and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  A D Hassin-Herman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast as differential time allocation.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contingency theory and the effect of the duration of signals for noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

6.  Effects of delayed conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules.

Authors:  P Royalty; B A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  An equation for behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.