Literature DB >> 16811543

Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules.

K A Lattal, G C Maxey.   

Abstract

In Exp. I, rats' lever presses were conditioned on multiple variable-interval variable-interval schedules. Changing one of the multiple schedule components to variable time reduced responding in that component. Further reductions in responding occurred in both components when the schedule was changed to multiple variable-time variable-time. After reinstating the multiple variable-interval variable-time schedule, lower response rates were maintained in the variable-time component during a series of stimulus reversals. In Exp. II, replacement of extinction components of multiple variable-interval extinction or multiple extinction extinction with variable-time schedules for single sessions (probe) resulted in response rate increments in those components. In the former schedule these increases were concomitant with response decreases during the variable-interval components. Response increases in the variable-time probes were related to conditioning history and, as a result, to response probability at the time of the probe.

Entities:  

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811543      PMCID: PMC1333872          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  OPERANT EXTINCTION NEAR ZERO.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  G A WERTHEIM
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  J B APPEL; R H HISS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

4.  Some effects of response-independent positive reinforcement on maintained operant behavior.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; W H MORSE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-10

5.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Free operant response reinstatement during extinction and time-contingent (DRO) reward.

Authors:  P Campbell; E Phillips; D Fixsen; C Crumbaugh
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1968-04

8.  Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinstatement of an operant response by the delivery of reinforcement during extinction.

Authors:  J E Spradlin; D L Fixsen; F L Girarbeau
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1969-02

10.  Stimulus properties of reinforcement during extinction of a free operant response.

Authors:  J E Spradlin; F L Girardeau; G L Hom
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1966-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

2.  Some effects of response-independent reinforcement on auditory generalization gradients.

Authors:  R C Huff; J E Sherman; M Cohn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  A review of reinforcement control procedures.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

4.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Responding maintained under fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  E F Malagodi; M L Gardner; G Palermo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response decrements produced by extinction and by response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response-reinforcer dependence and independence in multiple and mixed schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reponse-reinforcer independence and conventional extinction after fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.