Literature DB >> 16811742

The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

K Keller.   

Abstract

An attempt was made to separate operant and elicited pecks occurring in multiple schedules of food reinforcement by moving the component stimuli to a second key, upon which pecks had no effect. The operant key stimulus was constant, regardless of the reinforcement schedule in effect. Experiments included two- and three-component multiple schedules and a comparison of the single-key and the two-key procedures. In general, conditions that typically produce positive contrast in single-key procedures reduced responding to the constant-stimulus key (induction) and increased responding to the component-stimulus key (contrast) in the two-key procedure. The results were interpreted as supporting the contention that two response classes, operant and elicited, are present in standard multiple schedules. In addition, elicited responses were strongly implicated in contrast phenomena.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811742      PMCID: PMC1333192          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Key pecking under response-independent food presentation after long simple and compound stimuli.

Authors:  J A Ricci
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Maintenance of key pecking by response-independent food presentation: the role of the modality of the signal for food.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement schedules: the role of responses preceding the one that produces the reinforcer.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R D Weissman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast: Pavlovian effects and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  A D Hassin-Herman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus control of respondent and operant key pecking: A single key procedure.

Authors:  H Marcucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Real-time detection of orientation during negative behavioral contrast with key pecking and a turning response.

Authors:  K Manabe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Line-orientation generalization following signalled-reinforcer training.

Authors:  P Griffin; D J Stewart
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behaviors observed during S- in a simple discrimination learning task.

Authors:  J F Rand
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.