Literature DB >> 16811811

Effects of varying the percentage of key illuminations paired with food in a positive automaintenance procedure.

F A Gonzalez.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were exposed to a positive automaintenance procedure in which each trial began with a brief tone followed by the transillumination of a small central area of the response key for 10 sec. Key illumination was followed by food on 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, and 0% of the trials. The effects depended on the dependent variable observed. The mean rate of responding during key illumination rapidly increased and then decreased slightly as the percentage of key illuminations paired with food increased. The number of key illuminations during which at least one response occurred increased as a negatively accelerating function of the percentage of key illuminations paired with food, and the mean latency to the first response during the key illuminations decreased as a negatively decelerating function of the percentage condition. The mean rate of sustained responding during key illumination was not systematically affected by changes in the percentage conditions.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811811      PMCID: PMC1333296          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Intermittent Reinforcement of Discriminatively Controlled Responses and Runs of Responses.

Authors:  D W Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Acquisition of Key-Pecking via Autoshaping as a Function of Prior Experience: "Learned Laziness"?

Authors:  L A Engberg; G Hansen; R L Welker; D R Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Automaintenance without stimulus-change reinforcement: Temporal control of key pecks.

Authors:  J Myerson; W A Myerson; B K Parker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Autoshaping and automaintenance: a neural-network approach.

Authors:  José E Burgos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

4.  The effects of d-amphetamine on the automaintained key pecking of pigeons.

Authors:  A Poling; T Thompson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Choice as a dependent measure in autoshaping: sensitivity to frequency and duration of food presentation.

Authors:  M Picker; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discrimination and differentiation of response number in stimulus directed pecking of pigeons.

Authors:  P W Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  How the value of the environment controls persistence in visual search.

Authors:  Michael R Traner; Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Ilya E Monosov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.