Literature DB >> 16811278

Interresponse time as a function of continuous variables: a new method and some data.

D S Blough.   

Abstract

A cathode-ray oscilloscope and a Polaroid camera record interresponse times as a function of time, stimulus wavelength, and similar variables. Each response flashes a point of light on the oscilloscope screen; the vertical position of the point gives IRT, the horizontal position gives the value of the other variable. Several thousand such points may be recorded on a single frame of film, and the density of the points indicates the relative frequency of various IRTs. The method has the advantages of a two-dimensional display of continuous variables, flexibility, speed, and relatively low cost. It lacks the advantage of a digital output. Figures show IRTs of pigeons on VI, FR, DRL and extinction, and transitions among these, and also the results of stimulus generalization tests. The results have some provocative features that require much further exploration. Among other things, they suggest that "response rate" as a measure usually includes a response-dependent component that is insensitive to changes in other variables.

Year:  1963        PMID: 16811278      PMCID: PMC1404277          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  3 in total

1.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

2.  Discriminability and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN; H I KALISH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

3.  Theoretical Relationships Among Some Measures of Conditioning.

Authors:  C G Mueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  73 in total

1.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.

Authors:  R L Shull; S T Gaynor; J A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The principal components of response strength.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S S Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: resistance to extinction.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Scott T Gaynor; Julie A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Bouts of responding from variable-interval reinforcement of lever pressing by rats.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Julie A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Molecular analyses of the principal components of response strength.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Scott S Hall; Mark P Reilly; Lauren C Kettle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.

Authors:  E HEARST; M B KORESKO; R POPPEN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.

Authors:  B MIGLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  EFFECTS OF CLASS-INTERVAL SIZE UPON CERTAIN FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS OF INTER-RESPONSE TIMES.

Authors:  R C RAY; W MCGILL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Bouts of responding: the relation between bout rate and the rate of variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Julie A Grimes; J Adam Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Toward an explicit analysis of generalization: A stimulus control interpretation.

Authors:  K C Kirby; W K Bickel
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.