Literature DB >> 12822688

Reinforcing staying and switching while using a changeover delay.

James S MacDonall1.   

Abstract

Performance on concurrent schedules can be decomposed to run lengths (the number of responses before switching alternatives), or visit durations (time at an alternative before switching alternatives), that are a function of the ratio of the rates of reinforcement for staying and switching. From this analysis, a model of concurrent performance was developed and examined in two experiments. The first exposed rats to variable-interval schedules for staying and for switching, which included a changeover delay for reinforcers following a switch. With the changeover delay, run lengths and visit durations were functions of the ratios of the rates of reinforcement for staying and for switching, as found by previous research not using a changeover delay. The second directly assessed the effect of a changeover delay on run lengths and visit durations. Each component of a multiple schedule consisted of equivalent stay and switch schedules but only one component included a changeover delay. Run lengths and visit durations were longer when a changeover delay was used. Because visit duration is the reciprocal of changeover rate, these results are consistent with the established finding that a changeover delay reduces the frequency of switching. Together these results support the local model of concurrent performance as an alternative to the generalized matching law as a model of concurrent performance. The local model may be preferred when accounting for more molecular aspects of concurrent performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822688      PMCID: PMC1284931          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Synthesizing concurrent interval performances.

Authors:  J S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Run length, visit duration, and reinforcers per visit in concurrent performance.

Authors:  J Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A local model of concurrent performance.

Authors:  J Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Concurrent variable-ratio schedules: Implications for the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J S Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Earning and obtaining reinforcers under concurrent interval scheduling.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The stay/switch model of concurrent choice.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference as a function of active interresponse times: a test of the active time model.

Authors:  Paul Misak; J Mark Cleaveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  An alternative to the stay/switch equation assessed when using a changeover-delay.

Authors:  James S MacDonall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Fractionating choice: A study on reward discrimination, preference, and relative valuation in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Joshua M Ricker; Justin D Hatch; Daniel D Powers; Howard Casey Cromwell
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.