Literature DB >> 16812807

Changeover behavior and preference in concurrent schedules.

B A Williams, M C Bell.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a multiple schedule of reinforcement in which separate concurrent schedules occurred in each of two components. Key pecking was reinforced with milo. During one component, a variable-interval 40-s schedule was concurrent with a variable-interval 20-s schedule; during the other component, a variable-interval 40-s schedule was concurrent with a variable-interval 80-s schedule. During probe tests, the stimuli correlated with the two variable-interval 40-s schedules were presented simultaneously to assess preference, measured by the relative response rates to the two stimuli. In Experiment 1, the concurrently available variable-interval 20-s schedule operated normally; that is, reinforcer availability was not signaled. Following this baseline training, relative response rate during the probes favored the variable-interval 40-s alternative that had been paired with the lower valued schedule (i.e., with the variable-interval 80-s schedule). In Experiment 2, a signal for reinforcer availability was added to the high-value alternative (i.e., to the variable-interval 20-s schedule), thus reducing the rate of key pecking maintained by that schedule but leaving the reinforcement rate unchanged. Following that baseline training, relative response rates during probes favored the variable-interval 40-s alternative that had been paired with the higher valued schedule. The reversal in the pattern of preference implies that the pattern of changeover behavior established during training, and not reinforcement rate, determined the preference patterns obtained on the probe tests.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 16812807      PMCID: PMC1349949          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church; S Fairhurst; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  A test of the melioration theory of matching.

Authors:  B A Williams; P Royalty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1989-04

6.  Molar versus local reinforcement probability as determinants of stimulus value.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The process of recurrent choice.

Authors:  D G Davis; J E Staddon; A Machado; R G Palmer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The role of probability of reinforcement in models of choice.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference and resistance to change in concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  Matthew C Bell; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

3.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Influence of temporal context on value in the multiple-chains and successive-encounters procedures.

Authors:  Matthew O'Daly; Samuel Angulo; Cassandra Gipson; Edmund Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference as a function of active interresponse times: a test of the active time model.

Authors:  Paul Misak; J Mark Cleaveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.