Literature DB >> 16807699

Orthodontic springs and auxiliary appliances: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance systems.

J Kemper1, A N Priest, D Schulze, B Kahl-Nieke, G Adam, A Klocke.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to evaluate magnetic field interactions at 1.5 and 3 T for 20 orthodontic devices used for fixed orthodontic therapy. Twenty springs and auxiliary parts made from varying ferromagnetic alloys were tested for magnetic field interactions in the static magnetic field at 1.5 and 3 T. Magnetic translational force F(z) (in millinewtons) was evaluated by determining the deflection angle beta [American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM standard test method)]. Magnetic-field-induced rotational force F(rot) was qualitatively determined using a five-point scale. beta was found to be >45 degrees in 13(15) devices at 1.5(3) T and translational force F(z) exceeded gravitational force F(g) on the particular object [F(z) 10.17-261.4 mN (10.72-566.4 mN) at 1.5(3) T]. F(z) was found to be up to 24.1(47.5)-fold higher than F(g) at 1.5(3) T. Corresponding to this, F(rot) on the objects was shown to be high at both field strengths (> or = +3). Three objects (at 1.5 T) and one object (at 3 T) showed deflection angles <45 degrees , but F(rot) was found to be > or = +3 at both field strengths. For the remaining objects, beta was below 45 degrees and torque measurements ranged from 0 to +2. Of 20 objects investigated for magnetic field interactions at 1.5(3) T, 13(15) were unsafe in magnetic resonance (MR), based on the ASTM criteria of F(z). The implications of these results for orthodontic patients undergoing MRI are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16807699     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0335-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.

Authors:  F G Shellock; V J Shellock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T.

Authors:  M B Edwards; K M Taylor; F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Yoshie Okano; Mitsuaki Yamashiro; Takashi Kaneda; Kazutaka Kasai
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-02

4.  Aneurysm clips: evaluation of magnetic field interactions with an 8.0 T MR system.

Authors:  A Kangarlu; F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Cardiac pacemakers, ICDs, and loop recorder: evaluation of translational attraction using conventional ("long-bore") and "short-bore" 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla MR systems.

Authors:  Frank G Shellock; Jean A Tkach; Paul M Ruggieri; Thomas J Masaryk
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].

Authors:  T Sommer; D Maintz; A Schmiedel; M Hackenbroch; U Hofer; H Urbach; C Pavlidis; F Träber; H Schild; M Höher
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-05

7.  Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers.

Authors:  N J Kagetsu; A W Litt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Otologic bioimplants: ex vivo assessment of ferromagnetism and artifacts at 1.5 T.

Authors:  M Nogueira; F G Shellock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  [Orthodontic brackets in high field MR imaging: experimental evaluation of magnetic field interactions at 3.0 Tesla].

Authors:  J Kemper; A Klocke; B Kahl-Nieke; G Adam
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2005-12

10.  Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P F New; B R Rosen; T J Brady; F S Buonanno; J P Kistler; C T Burt; W S Hinshaw; J H Newhouse; G M Pohost; J M Taveras
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.

Authors:  Zhiyue J Wang; Nancy K Rollins; Hui Liang; Yong Jong Park
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Jörn Kemper; Michael G Kaul; Markus Feddersen; Gerhard Adam; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Arndt Klocke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  3-T MRI safety assessments of magnetic dental attachments and castable magnetic alloys.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; K Miyata; Y Abe; T Ishii; T Ishigami; K Ohtani; E Nagai; T Ohyama; Y Umekawa; S Nakabayashi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Patient safety incidents in dentomaxillofacial imaging: reported adverse events from Hospital District Helsinki and Uusimaa and the City of Helsinki during 2012-2017.

Authors:  Marianne Suuronen; Taina Autti; Lasse Lehtonen
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  A comparative study of metal artifacts from common metal orthodontic brackets in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Zahra Dalili Kajan; Jalil Khademi; Ahmad Alizadeh; Yasamin Babaei Hemmaty; Zahra Atrkar Roushan
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-09-09

6.  Compatibility of endoclips in the gastrointestinal tract with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Dong Yeol Shin; Sumi Park; Ain Kim; Eung-Sam Kim; Han Ho Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.