Literature DB >> 10931602

Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T.

M B Edwards1, K M Taylor, F G Shellock.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use ex vivo testing techniques to determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety aspects for 32 different heart valve prostheses that had not been evaluated previously in association with the 1.5-T MR environment. Ex vivo testing was performed using previously described techniques for the evaluation of magnetic field interactions (deflection angle and torque), heating [gel-filled phantom and fluoroptic thermometry; 15 minutes of MRI at a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 1.1 W/kg], and artifacts (using gradient echo and T1-weighted spin-echo pulse sequences). Thirteen heart valve prostheses displayed interactions with the magnetic field. However, these magnetic field interactions were considered relatively minor. Heating was < or =0.8 degrees C for these implants. Artifacts varied from mild to severe depending on the amount and type of metal used to make the particular heart valve prosthesis. For these 32 different heart valve prostheses, the relative lack of substantial magnetic field interactions and negligible heating indicate that MR procedures may be conducted safely in individuals with these implants using MR systems with static magnetic fields of 1.5 T or less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10931602     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2586(200008)12:2<363::aid-jmri21>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Quantification of periprosthetic valve leakage with multiple regurgitation jets by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Pflaumer; M Schwaiger; J Hess; R Lange; H Stern
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Orthodontic springs and auxiliary appliances: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance systems.

Authors:  J Kemper; A N Priest; D Schulze; B Kahl-Nieke; G Adam; A Klocke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constantin B Marcu; Aernout M Beek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  [The use of cross-sectional imaging modalities in the diagnosis of valvular heart disease].

Authors:  M Gutberlet; H Abdul-Khaliq; H Stobbe; M Fröhlich; B Spors; F Knollmann; P Lange; R Hetzer; R Felix
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2001-12

8.  Diagnostic approach to assessment of valvular heart disease using magnetic resonance imaging, part II: a practical approach for native and prosthetic heart valve stenosis.

Authors:  Lertlak Chaothawee
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2012-12-12

9.  Purely phase-encoded MRI of turbulent flow through a dysfunctional bileaflet mechanical heart valve.

Authors:  Olusegun Adegbite; Lyes Kadem; Benedict Newling
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.