Literature DB >> 15122473

[High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].

T Sommer1, D Maintz, A Schmiedel, M Hackenbroch, U Hofer, H Urbach, C Pavlidis, F Träber, H Schild, M Höher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate magnetic field interactions of commonly used biomedical implants at 3.0 Tesla.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen aneurysm clips designed for permanent placement in intracranial aneurysms, 19 coronary artery stents and 20 iliac artery stents were evaluated in an actively shielded compact 3.0 T MR system (Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands, length of magnet 1.57 m). The magnetic deflection forces (translational movement) were evaluated as follows: The implants were suspended by a fine string and placed in the magnet bore at the location of the maximum magnetic field gradient. The translational forces F (z) were calculated from the measured angle of deflection from the vertical axis. The magnetic field-induced torque (rotational forces) was evaluated as follows: Each implant was placed in the center of the magnetic bore parallel to the static magnetic field B0 (position 0 degrees ). Any possible displacement of the implant was noted on a millimeter scale and any torque qualitatively evaluated using a 5 point grading scale (0: no torque; + 4: very strong torque). The implant was turned in steps of 45 degrees, and the procedure was repeated to encompass a full 360 degrees rotation.
RESULTS: In 52 of the 53 devices tested, the deflection force (deflection angle: range 0-21 degrees, translational force: range 0-3.8 mN) was less than the gravitational force (i.e., the implant's weight). These devices (n = 52/53) did not show any alignment to or rotation in the magnetic field at any of the various 45 degrees -increment positions corresponding to a qualitative torque evaluation of grade 0/4. One device (n = 1/53), an iliac artery stent made of stainless steel (Zenith, Cook, Mönchengladbach, BRD), was found to have deflection forces (deflection angle 88 degrees translational force 299 mN) greatly exceeding the gravitational force as well as a pronounced torque (grade 4/4).
CONCLUSION: Out of 53 biomedical implants evaluated for magnetic field interactions at 3.0 T, one iliac artery stent made of stainless steel was found to be potentially unsafe based on ASTM criteria. MR imaging at 3.0 Tesla may be performed safely in patients with any of the other 52 different implants evaluated in this study with respect to magnetic field translational attraction and torque.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15122473     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-812754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  9 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  [Effects of magnetic resonance tomography on upper eyelid implants].

Authors:  T Schrom; H Bauknecht; A Berghaus; H Scherer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Orthodontic springs and auxiliary appliances: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance systems.

Authors:  J Kemper; A N Priest; D Schulze; B Kahl-Nieke; G Adam; A Klocke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Body MRI artefacts: from image degradation to diagnostic utility.

Authors:  G Rescinito; C Sirlin; G Cittadini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Jörn Kemper; Michael G Kaul; Markus Feddersen; Gerhard Adam; Bärbel Kahl-Nieke; Arndt Klocke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Blankenstein; B T Truong; A Thomas; N Thieme; C Zachriat
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Impact of cardiac magnet resonance imaging on management of ventricular septal rupture after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Tobias Gassenmaier; Armin Gorski; Ivan Aleksic; Nikolas Deubner; Frank Weidemann; Meinrad Beer
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-26

9.  Clinical safety of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T early after stent placement for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jérôme Jehl; Alexandre Comte; Sébastien Aubry; Nicolas Meneveau; François Schiele; Bruno Kastler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.