Literature DB >> 16795849

Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings.

G Galbicka1.   

Abstract

The present paper provides a primer on percentile reinforcement schedules, which have been used for two decades to study response differentiation and shaping in the laboratory. Arranged in applied settings, percentile procedures could be used to specify response criteria, standardizing treatment across subjects, trainers, and times to provide a more consistent training environment while maintaining the sensitivity to the individual's repertoire that is the hallmark of shaping. Percentile schedules are also valuable tools in analyzing the variables of which responding is a function, both inside and outside the laboratory. Finally, by formalizing the rules of shaping, percentile schedules provide a useful heuristic of the processes involved in shaping behavior, even for those situations that may not easily permit their implementation. As such, they may help further sensitize trainers and researchers alike to variables of critical importance in behavior change.

Year:  1994        PMID: 16795849      PMCID: PMC1297861          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  11 in total

1.  Reinforcement loss and behavioral tolerance to d-amphetamine: using percentile schedules to control reinforcement density.

Authors:  G. Galbicka; M.A. Kautz; Z.J. Ritch
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcement rate and interresponse time differentiation.

Authors:  D O Kuch; J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Control over response number by a targeted percentile schedule: reinforcement loss and the acute effects of d-amphetamine.

Authors:  G Galbicka; K P Fowler; Z J Ritch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Operant conditioning of behavioral variability using a percentile reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A Machado
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response-reinforcer contingency and spatially defined operants: testing an invariance property of phi.

Authors:  G Galbicka; J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.

Authors:  G Galbicka; J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1986-10

8.  Response acquisition under targeted percentile schedules: a continuing quandary for molar models of operant behavior.

Authors:  G Galbicka; M A Kautz; T Jagers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Motivational and response factors in temporal differentiation.

Authors:  J R Platt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Rats' lever-press durations as psychophysical judgements of time.

Authors:  J R Platt; D O Kuch; S C Bitgood
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  The aesthetics of intervention in defense of the esoteric.

Authors:  Iser G Deleon
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011

3.  Novelty, stimulus control, and operant variability.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Philip N Chase
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

4.  Behavioral assessment of physical activity in obese preschool children.

Authors:  Kristin M Hustyi; Matthew P Normand; Tracy A Larson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

5.  A runs-test algorithm: contingent reinforcement and response run structures.

Authors:  Yosuke Hachiga; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Recent reinforcement-schedule research and applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal; N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

7.  Operant variability when reinforcement is delayed.

Authors:  Katie Wagner; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Shaping academic task engagement with percentile schedules.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Athens; Timothy R Vollmer; Claire C St Peter Pipkin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

9.  Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability.

Authors:  Céline Paeye; Laurent Madelain
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of internet-based voucher reinforcement and a transdermal nicotine patch on cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Irene M Glenn; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.