Literature DB >> 16811962

Reinforcement rate and interresponse time differentiation.

D O Kuch, J R Platt.   

Abstract

Reinforcement rate and differential reinforcement of IRTs were independently manipulated to assess their relative contribution to the control of interresponse times (IRTs). Modified percentile reinforcement schedules (Platt, 1973) allowed control of reinforcement rate while longest or shortest IRTs were selectively reinforced. In the absence of differential IRT reinforcement, mean IRT decreased with increasing reinforcement rate. Compared to this small effect of reinforcement rate, reinforcement of long IRTs produced large changes in mean IRT at constant reinforcement rates. No interaction of reinforcement rate and IRT reinforcement was detected. The demonstration of large IRT changes in the absence of reinforcement-rate changes indicates the precedence of IRT reinforcement over molar reinforcement-rate correlations in the determination of IRTs in these procedures.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811962      PMCID: PMC1333537          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

2.  The effect upon simple animal behavior of different frequencies of reinforcement, Part II: separate control of the reinforcement of different IRTs.

Authors:  D Anger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A test of the effectiveness of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule.

Authors:  W K Richardson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Magnitude and frequency of reinforcement and frequencies of interresponse times.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Rats' lever-press durations as psychophysical judgements of time.

Authors:  J R Platt; D O Kuch; S C Bitgood
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  The copyist model of response emission.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

2.  Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

3.  Recent reinforcement-schedule research and applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal; N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

4.  Molecular contingencies in schedules of intermittent punishment.

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Fixed-interval matching-to-sample: intermatching time and intermatching error runs.

Authors:  T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Yoked variable-ratio and variable-interval responding in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania; T J Matthews; P J Silverman; R Yohalem
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Interresponse-time shaping by variable-interval-like interresponse-time reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  J R Platt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response-rate differences in variable-interval and variable-ratio schedules: An old problem revisited.

Authors:  M R Cole
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Shaping academic task engagement with percentile schedules.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Athens; Timothy R Vollmer; Claire C St Peter Pipkin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.