Literature DB >> 3772301

Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.

G Galbicka, J R Platt.   

Abstract

Pecking of pigeons was reinforced under a modified interval-percentile procedure that allowed independent manipulation of overall reinforcement rate and the degree to which reinforcement depended on interresponse-time duration. Increasing the contingency, as measured by the phi coefficient, between reinforcement and long interresponse times while controlling the overall rate of reinforcement systematically increased the frequency of those interresponse times and decreased response rate under both of the reinforcement rates studied. Increasing reinforcement rate also generally increased response rate, particularly under weaker interresponse-time contingencies. Random-interval schedules with comparable reinforcement rates generated response rates and interresponse-time distributions similar to those obtained with moderate-to-high interresponse-time reinforcement contingencies. These results suggest that interresponse-time reinforcement contingencies inherent in random-interval and constant-probability variable-interval schedules exercise substantial control over responding independent of overall reinforcement rate effects. The interresponse-time reinforcement contingencies inherent in these schedules may actually mask the effects of overall reinforcement rate; thus differences in response rate as a function of reinforcement rate when interresponse-time reinforcement is eliminated may be underestimated.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3772301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  17 in total

1.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.

Authors:  R L Shull; S T Gaynor; J A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  MPR.

Authors:  Peter R. Killeen; Matthew T. Sitomer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Dynamics in the fine structure of schedule-controlled behavior.

Authors:  W L Palya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Shaping in the 21st century: Moving percentile schedules into applied settings.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

5.  The dynamics of behavior (Editorial).

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Differentiating the behavior of organisms.

Authors:  G Galbicka
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavior dynamics: One perspective.

Authors:  M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Continuous versus discrete dimensions of reinforcement schedules: An integrative analysis.

Authors:  D C Williams; J M Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response-rate differences in variable-interval and variable-ratio schedules: An old problem revisited.

Authors:  M R Cole
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A bout analysis reveals age-related methylmercury neurotoxicity and nimodipine neuroprotection.

Authors:  Andrew Nathanael Shen; Craig Cummings; Derek Pope; Daniel Hoffman; M Christopher Newland
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.